苏轼《灵壁张氏园亭记》"显涉讥讽"辩证
Dialectical Analysis of Overt Satire in Su Shi's Record of Zhang's Garden Pavilion in Lingbi
吴昊1
作者信息
- 1. 汕头大学文学院,广东汕头 515063
- 折叠
摘要
在北宋"乌台诗案"中,国子博士李宜之非任言官,却上疏弹劾苏轼所作《灵壁张氏园亭记》"显涉讥讽",历来备受学者诟病.实际上,李宜之时任淮南东路提举常平官,负有监察地方官吏的职责,且《灵壁张氏园亭记》一文创作于淮南东路所辖之地宿州,李宜之弹劾苏轼有其制度依据,并非完全无端构衅.但是,李宜之认为《灵壁张氏园亭记》一文"显涉讥讽"则不足取信,是对文章主旨的误读与曲解.御史台审讯之时,苏轼也明言此文并无讥讽,且御史台认可其言.大理寺根据御史台的"供状"依法为苏轼定罪,也未将此文视作罪证.李宜之的弹劾在"乌台诗案"的具体审判过程中并未产生实质性作用.
Abstract
In the"Wutai Poetry Case",Li Yizhi held no official position as a censor,yet he petitioned to cen-sure Su Shi's Record of Zhang's Garden Pavilion in Lingbi for"overt satire",which has long been criticized by scholars.In fact,the specific official position held by Li Yizhi at that time was the Changping official of Huainan East Road,and he also had the responsibility of supervising local officials.Moreover,Su Shi's Record of Zhang's Garden Pavilion in Lingbi was created in Suzhou,a place under the jurisdiction of Huainan East Road,Li Yizhi's impeachment of Su Shi had a basis in the institutional context,rather than being completely groundless.However,Li Yizhi's assertion that Record of Zhang's Garden Pavilion in Lingbi was overtly satirical is not entirely trustworthy,as it reflects a misreading and misinterpretation of the main theme of the article.Moreover,during the interrogation of the Censorate,Su Shi himself also made it clear that the article contained no satire,which was also recognized by the Censorate.While the Supreme Court convicted Su Shi based on the Imperial Censorate's testimony,the essay in question was not deemed incriminating evidence.Ultimately,Li Yizhi's critique played a negligible role in the adjudication of the"Wutai Poetry Case".
关键词
苏轼/乌台诗案/李宜之/讥讽Key words
Su Shi/Wutai Poetry Case/Li Yizhi/Satire引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据