首页|显微镜辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎滑脱症

显微镜辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎滑脱症

扫码查看
目的 探讨显微镜辅助经Quadrant通道结合经皮椎弓根钉固定行微创小切口经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗单节段腰椎退行性滑脱症的疗效.方法 回顾性分析 2018 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月行椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性滑脱症患者的临床资料,其中采用开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗患者 41 例(开放组),经Wiltse入路Quadrant通道直视下TLIF治疗 患者 25 例(微创组),显微镜下减压并采用经皮椎弓根钉TLIF治疗患者38 例(显微组).记录 3 组患者手术时间、术中出血量、X线透视次数、引流量、术后 2 天和 7 天切口周围疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、并发症情况,术后CT检查评估椎弓根钉置钉准确率,记录术前及术后6 个月、24 个月日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI),末次随访时采用改良MacNab标准评价临床疗效.结果 所有手术均顺利完成.显微组术中出血量、引流量、术后 2 天和 7 天切口周围疼痛VAS评分均小于微创组和开放组(P<0.05),椎弓根钉置钉准确率高于微创组和开放组(P<0.05),但术中X线透视次数高于微创组和开放组(P<0.05).开放组发生术后切口浅表软组织感染1例,疑似感染1例,脑脊液漏1例;微创组出现术后短暂性神经症状2例.3组术后6个月、24 个月JOA评分和ODI评分均较术前明显改善(P<0.05),3 组间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05).术后 6 个月和 24 个月融合率 3 组间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05).按改良MacNab标准,3 组患者疗效优良率无统计学差异(P>0.05).结论 显微镜辅助通道下MIS-TLIF治疗单节段腰椎退行性滑脱症,术中出血少、切口疼痛感小、并发症少,采用经皮椎弓根钉置钉准确率高,融合率、疗效优良率与开放手术一致,临床疗效好.
Microscopy-assisted minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single lumbar spondylolisthesis
Objective To investigate the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)in the treatment of single segment lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis by microscopy-assisted Quadrant channel combined with percutaneous pedicle nail fixation.Methods From April 2018 to March 2021,the clinical data of patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolysis who underwent interbody fusion were retrospectively analyzed.Forty-one patients were treated by open transforaminal lumbar interbody(TLIF)(open group),25 patients were treated by TLIF through Quadrant channel via the Wiltse approach(minimally-invasive group),and 38 patients were treated by compression and percutaneous pedicle screw TLIF(microscopic group).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,fluoroscopy times,drainage volume,visual analogue scale(VAS)of pain around the incision at 2 and 7 days after operation,and complications were recorded in the three groups.The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated by postoperative CT.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)scores and Oswestry Dability Index(ODI)were evaluated before operation and at 6 and 24 months after operation.Results Compared with the minimally-invasive group and the open group,the microsurgical group had less intraoperative blood loss,smaller drainage volume,and lower VAS scores of pain around the incision at 2 and 7 d after operation.The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was higher in the microscopic group than in the other two groups(P<0.05),but more intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopies were required(P<0.05).There were one case of superficial soft tissue infection,one case of suspected infection,and one case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage in the open group,and two cases of transient neurological symptoms in the minimally-invasive group.The JOA and ODI scores of the three groups at 6 and 24 months after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the groups(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in fusion rate at 6 and 24 months after operation between the three groups(P>0.05).According to the modified MacNab criteria,there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rates of curative effect among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Microscopically-assisted MIS-TLIF for the treatment of single segment lumbar degenerative spondylolysis results in less bleeding,less incision pain and fewer complications.Percutaneous pedicle screw placement is highly accurate.The fusion rate and the excellent and good curative effect rates are the same as those of open surgery.The clinical outcome is good.

Microscopic surgeryMinimally-invasive surgeryLumbar degenerative spondylolisthesisTransforaminal interbody fusion

施耀华、杨建平、赵洪、翟羽、黎俊

展开 >

213000,常州市中医医院脊柱外科

显微镜 微创 腰椎退行性滑脱 经椎间孔椎体间融合术

常州市卫健委青年人才科技计划

QN202044

2024

国际骨科学杂志
上海市医学科学技术情报研究所

国际骨科学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.073
ISSN:1673-7083
年,卷(期):2024.45(1)
  • 3