首页|不同术后镇痛方式对食管癌患者术后镇痛效果及细胞因子的影响

不同术后镇痛方式对食管癌患者术后镇痛效果及细胞因子的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)对食管癌根治术患者术后镇痛效果及细胞因子水平的影响.方法 择期行食管癌根治术的患者36例,采用随机数字表法按3:2分为PCEA组(21例)与PCIA组(15例).两组其他麻醉相同基础上,PCEA组术后采用罗哌卡因(0.15%)联合芬太尼(2mg/L)的PCEA方案,PCIA组术后采用芬太尼(12μg/kg)的PCIA方案.记录两组患者一般资料,术后2、4、8、16、24、36、48h静息及运动数字分级评分法(NRS)评分,术后不良反应发生情况,术前、手术结束、术后24h、术后48 h血清白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、IL-10、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α水平.结果 两组患者一般资料差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).PCEA组患者术后4、8、16、24、36h静息及运动NRS评分低于PCIA组(均P<0.05),两组患者术后2、48 h时静息及运动NRS评分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).两组患者不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).PCEA组患者术后48 h血清IL-6水平低于PCIA组(P<0.05),PCEA组患者术后48 h血清IL-1β、IL-6、IL-10水平均低于术后24 h时(均P<0.05).两组患者其余指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 食管癌根治术患者术后采用PCEA较PCIA能提供更好的术后镇痛效果,降低患者术后48 h血清IL-6水平.
Evaluation of the effects of different postoperative analgesic modalities on postoperative analgesia in patients with esopha-geal cancer and their effects on cytokines
Objective To explore the effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia(PCEA)and patient-controlled intrave-nous analgesia(PCIA)on postoperative analgesia and cytokine levels in serum on patients undergoing resection of esophageal carcino-ma.Methods Thirty-six patients scheduled for elective resection of esophageal carcinoma were assigned to PECA group(21 cases)or PCIA group(15cases)according to the random number table method in a 3:2 ratio.Based on the same other anesthetics in the two groups,the patients in the PCEA group received combined use of ropivacaine(0.15%)and fentanyl(2 mg/L)for PCEA,while the pa-tients in the PCIA group used fentanyl(12 μg/kg)for PCIA as an analgesic regimen.The general information of patients in both groups,postoperative Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)scores at 2,4,8,16,24,36 h and 48 h for rest and movement,and the occurrence of post-operative adverse events were recorded.The serum levels of interleukin(IL)-1β,IL-6,IL-10,and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)at preoperative,end of the surgery,24 h and 48 h after the surgery were measured in both groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences in general patient information between the two groups(all P>0.05).The NRS scores at rest and during movement in the PCEA group were lower than those in the PCIA group at 4,8,16,24 h and 36 h after surgery(all P<0.05).However,there was no statistically significant difference in NRS scores at rest and during movement between the two groups at 2 h and 48 h after surgery(all P>0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups(all P>0.05).Serum IL-6 levels in the PCEA group were lower than those in the PCIA group at 48 h postoperatively(P<0.05).In addition,the serum levels of IL-1β,IL-6,and IL-10 in the PCEA group at 48 h after surgery were lower than the levels at 24 h after surgery(all P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the remaining indicators(all P>0.05).Conclusions Epidural analgesia was superior to intravenous analgesia for patient-controlled postoperative pain relief after esophagectomy and reduced serum IL-6 levels at 48 h after surgery.

Epidural analgesiaPatient controlled analgesiaEsophagectomyCytokines

马玉、刘育贤、李彭依、刘辉、卞清明

展开 >

南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院,江苏省肿瘤医院,江苏省肿瘤防治研究所麻醉科,南京 210009

徐州医科大学江苏省麻醉学重点实验室,江苏省麻醉与镇痛应用技术重点实验室,徐州 221004

硬膜外镇痛 患者自控镇痛 食管切除术 细胞因子

江苏省卫健委科研项目

Z-201403

2024

国际麻醉学与复苏杂志
中华医学会,徐州医学院

国际麻醉学与复苏杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.909
ISSN:1673-4378
年,卷(期):2024.45(9)