首页|SaCoVLMTM可视喉罩与Ambu?Aura-Gain喉罩联合可视软镜引导小儿气管插管的随机对照研究

SaCoVLMTM可视喉罩与Ambu?Aura-Gain喉罩联合可视软镜引导小儿气管插管的随机对照研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨SaCoVLMTM可视喉罩与Ambu® Aura-Gain喉罩联合可视软镜(FOB)引导气管插管在小儿全麻气道管理中的临床效果.方法 择期行全麻手术的患儿100例,年龄1~6岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级,马氏(Mallam-pati)分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级,按随机数字表法分为两组(每组50例):SaCoVLMTM可视喉罩组(SaCo组)和Ambu®Aura-Gain喉罩联合可视软镜组(Ambu组).SaCo组经可视喉罩引导直接进行气管插管,Ambu组经Ambu®Aura-Gain喉罩联合可视软镜引导行气管插管.记录两组患儿一般资料.主要观察指标是气管插管成功的总时间(即喉罩置入时间+气管插管时间).次要观察指标包括气管插管首次成功率,喉罩置入时间,喉罩置入次数,喉罩密封压,气管插管时间,声门暴露分级,入室时(T0)、喉罩置入前(T1)、喉罩置入后即刻(T2)、气管插管前(T3)、气管插管后1 min(T4)、气管插管后2 min(T5)、气管插管后5 min(T6)、拔管后即刻(T7)的血流动力学参数[平均动脉压(MAP)、心率、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)],喉罩留置时间,拔管时间,喉罩和气管插管相关并发症(喉罩表面染血、导管染血、呛咳、低氧血症、咽痛、喉痉挛、吞咽困难及声音嘶哑等).结果 两组患儿一般资料差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).与Ambu组比较,SaCo组患儿气管插管成功总时间和气管插管时间较短(均P<0.05),气管插管首次成功率和喉罩密封压较高(P<0.05),喉罩置入时间较长(P<0.05),T4时心率较低(P<0.05).所有患儿均一次成功置入喉罩.两组患儿声门暴露分级、喉罩留置时间和拔管时间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).两组患儿T0~T3、T5~T7时心率及各时点MAP和SpO2差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).拔除喉罩后,两组患儿喉罩表面染血、咽痛的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).两组患儿均无导管染血、呛咳、喉痉挛、低氧血症、吞咽困难以及声音嘶哑等相关并发症的发生.结论 与Am-bu® Aura-Gain 喉罩联合可视软镜相比,SaCoVLMTM可视喉罩引导小儿气管插管更为简单易行,气管插管首次成功率高,有可能为小儿困难气道管理提供更好的解决方案.
A randomized controlled trial comparing SaCoVLMTM video laryngeal mask airway-guided intubation with Am-bu?Aura-Gain laryngeal mask airway combined with fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation in children
Objective To explore the clinical effect of SaCoVLMTM video laryngeal mask airway and Ambu®Aura-Gain laryn-geal mask airway combined with fiberoptic bronchoscopy(FOB)for airway management in children under general anesthesia.Meth-ods According to the random number table method,100 patients aged 1-6 years,classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status(ASA)Ⅰ or Ⅱ and Mallampati grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ,were divided into two groups(n=50):the SaCoVLMTM laryngeal mask airway-guided intubation group(SaCo group)and the Ambu®Aura-Gain combined with FOB group(Ambu group).In the SaCo group,tracheal intubation was performed directly under the guidance of video laryngeal mask airway.In the Ambu group,tracheal intubation was guided by Ambu®Aura-Gain laryngeal mask airway combined with FOB.General data of two groups were recorded.Primary out-come is the total time to successful tracheal intubation.Secondary outcomes include the first-attempt success rate of intubation,time of laryngeal mask insertion,number of laryngeal mask insertion,leakage pressure,time of intubation,glottis exposure grade,the hemody-namic variables[at admission to the operating room(T0),before laryngeal mask airway insertion(T1),immediately after laryngeal mask airway insertion(T2),before intubation(T3),1 minute after intubation(T4),2 minutes after intubation(T5),5 minutes after intubation(T6),and after extubation(T7)],the retention time of laryngeal mask airway,extubation time,and complications associated with larynge-al mask placement and tracheal intubation(including laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube surface blood staining,choking,hypox-emia,sore throat,laryngospasm,dysphagia,hoarseness,etc).Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups(all P>0.05).Compared with the Ambu group,the SaCo group had shorter the total time of successful tracheal intubation and the time of intubation(all P<0.05),a higher first-attempt success rate of intubation and a higher leakage pressure(P<0.05),a lon-ger time for laryngeal mask airway insertion(P<0.05)and a lower heart rate at T4(P<0.05).Laryngeal mask airway was successfully in-serted in children at one time.There were no significant differences in the glottis exposure grade,the time of laryngeal mask insertion and extubation time between the two groups(all P>0.05).There was no significant difference in heart rate at T0-T3 and T5-T7,mean arterial pressure and pulse oxygen saturation at each time point between the two groups(all P>0.05).After the laryngeal mask airway was removed,there was no significant difference in the incidence of blood staining on the laryngeal mask surface and sore throat be-tween the two groups(all P>0.05).There were no related complications such as tracheal tube surface blood staining,choking,laryngo-spasm,hypoxemia,dysphagia,and hoarseness in both groups.Conclusions Compared with the Ambu®Aura-Gain laryngeal mask airway combined with FOB,the SaCoVLMTM video laryngeal mask airway is easier to use and has a higher first-attempt success rate of intubation.It may provide a better solution for managing difficult airway in children.

ChildrenSaCoVLMTM video laryngeal mask airwayAmbu®Aura-Gain laryngeal mask airwayTracheal intu-bationAirway management

陈莹、孔令玉、韩丁、李泳鑫、陈凌宇、潘守东

展开 >

首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院麻醉科,北京 100020

小儿 SaCoVLMTM可视喉罩 Ambu®Aura-Gain喉罩 气管插管 气道管理

2024

国际麻醉学与复苏杂志
中华医学会,徐州医学院

国际麻醉学与复苏杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.909
ISSN:1673-4378
年,卷(期):2024.45(12)