首页|卒中后抑郁筛查工具的概括性评价

卒中后抑郁筛查工具的概括性评价

扫码查看
目的 对卒中后抑郁(post-stroke depression,PSD)评估工具进行概括性评价.方法 检索8个中英文数据库,检索时限为建库至2022年12月31日.依据概括性评价理论框架,提取相关信息,对检索结果进行分析.结果 最终纳入文献44篇,20篇为评估工具的开发,24篇为评估工具的信度、效度、敏感性和特异性检验.结论 目前已有针对PSD患者的特异性评估工具,但缺乏信度和效度检验,未来应增强对特异性评估工具的检验.选择非特异性评估工具时,应选择敏感性高的评估工具.评估结果受到很多因素影响,在选择评估工具时要综合评估工具的使用条件、评估者和患者自身条件等因素.
Scoping review of post-stroke depression screening tools
Objective To generally evaluate the evaluation tools of post-stroke depression(PSD).Methods Eight Chinese and English databases were retrieved,with a search deadline from the database establishment until December 31,2022.Based on the theoretical framework of scope review,the relevant information was extracted and search results were analyzed.Results 44 articles were included,20 of which were for the development of evaluation tools,and 24 were for the reliability,validity,sensitivity,and specificity tests of evaluation tools.Conclusions At present,specific evaluation tools for patients with PSD have been available,but there is a lack of reliability and validity tests.In the future,the tests of specific evaluation tools should be strengthened.When choosing non-specific evaluation tools,high sensitivity evaluation tools should be selected.The evaluation results are influenced by many factors,and when selecting evaluation tools,it is necessary to generally evaluate factors such as the conditions of tool use,evaluator,and patient's own conditions.

StrokeDepressionMass screeningReproducibility of resultsSensitivity and specificity,General evaluation

王亚杰、夏经菊、郑方遒、郑立敏、王丹彤

展开 >

辽宁省人民医院神经内科,沈阳 110000

辽宁中医药大学,沈阳 110000

卒中 抑郁症 群体筛查 结果可重复性 敏感性和特异性

2024

国际脑血管病杂志
中华医学会,南方医科大学南方医院,海军总医院

国际脑血管病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.851
ISSN:1673-4165
年,卷(期):2024.32(4)
  • 1