国际外科学杂志2018,Vol.45Issue(12) :824-827,封3.

日间手术与次日出院的腹腔镜胆囊切除术回顾性病例对照研究

A retrospective case-control study on fast tract laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ambulatory surgery versus over-night surgery

郭伟 周晓娜 刘军 金岚 李建设 张忠涛
国际外科学杂志2018,Vol.45Issue(12) :824-827,封3.

日间手术与次日出院的腹腔镜胆囊切除术回顾性病例对照研究

A retrospective case-control study on fast tract laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ambulatory surgery versus over-night surgery

郭伟 1周晓娜 1刘军 1金岚 1李建设 1张忠涛1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普外科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ALC)的手术指征.方法 收集首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普外科2016年1月-2018年9月接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术2277例患者的病历资料,其中行ALC术患者1072例(ALC组),次日出院的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(OLC)患者835例(OLC组),比较两组患者在手术指征指标(年龄、诊断、伴随疾病、ASA评分)和手术结局指标(手术时间、术后镇痛、非计划再入院、医疗费用)方面的差异.采用SPSS 22.0进行统计分析.结果 两组患者在手术指征指标,如年龄段分布、主要诊断、伴随疾病和ASA评分方面的差异明显;在手术结局指标,如手术时间[(42.6±12.4) min比(48.7±20.3) min,P=0.326)]、非计划再入院(6/1072比3/835,P=0.526)方面差异无统计学意义.平均检查费和平均住院费相比,ALC组的均低于OLC组[(1667.10±461.69)元比(3156.44±884.90)元)];(8881.69±1954.34)元比(12149.79±3476.59)元,差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 伴随疾病较多不是ALC的绝对排除标准,如果能够完善门诊检查流程,充分评估麻醉和手术风险,排除手术禁忌证,更多的患者可以采用ALC治疗.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the optimal indications for the ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ALC).Methods From Jan.2016 to Sep.2018,2277 case who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed in Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,including 1072 cases of ALC (ALC group) and 835 cases of overnight laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OLC group).Indications including age,diagnosis,comorbidity and ASA score,and outcomes including operative time,analgesic,unplanned readmission and hospital cost were compared between ALC group and OLC group.Statistical analysis was conducted by the software of SPSS 20.0.Results There were no differences in the operative time [(42.6 ± 12.4) min vs.(48.7 ±20.3) min,P =0.326] and unplanned readmission (6/1072 vs.3/835,P =0.526).The examination cost [(1 667.10 ± 461.69) vs (3 156.44 ± 884.90)] and hospital cost (8 881.69 ± 1 954.34 vs.12 149.79 ± 3 476.59) was significant lower in ALC group,and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01).Conclusions The comorbidities were not absolute exclusion criterion for ALC.More patients could be treated by ALC if the preoperative assessment streamlining in outpatient clinic was more improved.

关键词

胆囊切除术,腹腔镜/病例对照研究/住院病人/手术指征/日间手术

Key words

Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic/Case-control studies/Surgical indication/Ambulatory surgery

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

首都临床特色应用研究(Z161100000516082)

北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PX2016001)

首都卫生发展科研专项重点攻关项目(2016-1-1111)

出版年

2018
国际外科学杂志
中华医学会 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院

国际外科学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.961
ISSN:1673-4203
被引量4
参考文献量2
段落导航相关论文