首页|临床药师干预对肛肠科痔切除术围术期预防性应用抗菌药物的效果评价

临床药师干预对肛肠科痔切除术围术期预防性应用抗菌药物的效果评价

扫码查看
目的 评价临床药师采用专项处方点评模式干预对肛肠科痔切除术围术期抗菌药物预防使用的效果.方法 参考国内外最新指南和专家共识,制定痔切除术围术期预防性应用抗菌药物点评标准,建立专项处方点评模式.根据纳入和排除标准,筛选出肛肠科2022年1月~6月收治的174例痔切除术患者为对照组,2023年1月~6月临床药师实施干预的150例痔切除术患者为干预组,比较两组患者围术期预防性使用抗菌药物的情况及住院指标.结果 两组患者一般临床资料经比较其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).临床药师干预后,肛肠科痔切除术围术期抗菌药物预防性使用的不合理率显著下降,干预组在遴选药品、给药时机、给药频次、单次剂量、给药疗程及联合用药方面不合理率均明显低于对照组(P<0.05),且人均住院时间、人均抗菌药物使用时间、人均住院费用、人均药品费用及人均抗菌药物费用均有不同程度的降低(P<0.05).干预前,围术期偏好使用第二代头孢菌素类联合第二/三代硝基咪唑类药物预防感染;干预后,围术期第一代头孢菌素类和第一代硝基咪唑类药物的使用率显著上升,联合用药以头孢唑林加甲硝唑为主,且肛肠科每月抗菌药物使用强度均在规定范围,较干预前差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 临床药师干预显著提高了肛肠科痔切除术围术期预防性应用抗菌药物的合理性,并有效降低了患者的住院费用.
Evaluation of the Effect of Clinical Pharmacists Intervention on the Prophylactic Use of Antibiotics During the Perioperative Period of Hemorrhoidectomy in Anorectal Department
Objective To evaluate the effect of special prescription comment mode intervention by clinical pharmacists on the prophylactic use of antibiotics during the perioperative period of hemorrhoidectomy in the anorectal department.Methods Using the most recent recommendations and expert consensus at home and abroad,construct comment criteria for prophylactic use of antibiotics during the perioperative period of hemorrhoidectomy,as well as a particular prescription comment mode.According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,174 patients with hemorrhoidectomy admitted to the anorectal department from January to June 2022 were selected as the control group,and 150 patients with hemorrhoidectomy who underwent intervention by clinical pharmacists from January to June 2023 were selected as the intervention group.Comparison of prophylactic use of antibiotics during the perioperative period and hospitalization related indicators between two groups of patients.Results There was no statistically significant difference in general clinical data between the two groups of patients after comparison(P>0.05).After the intervention of clinical pharmacists,the unreasonable rate of prophylactic use of antibiotics during the perioperative period of hemorrhoidectomy in the anorectal department significantly decreased.When compared to the control group,the intervention group exhibited significantly lower unreasonable rate in terms of drug selection,time,frequency,single dosage,duration,and combination use of medications(P<0.05).The average hospitalization time,the average duration of antibiotics use,the average hospitalization cost,the average drug cost and the average antibiotics cost were all reduced to varying degrees(P<0.05).In order to avoid infection during the perioperative phase,it is prefer to utilize second-generation cephalosporins in conjunction with second-or third-generation nitroimidazoles prior to intervention.After intervention,the usage rates of first-generation cephalosporins and first-generation nitroimidazoles significantly increased during the perioperative period,and the combination use of drugs was mainly cefazolin combined with metronidazole.Moreover,the antibiotics use density in the anorectal department was within the prescribed range every month,and the difference was statistically significant compared with before intervention(P<0.05).Conclusions The intervention of clinical pharmacists significantly improved the rationality of the prophylactic use of antibiotics during the perioperative period of hemorrhoidectomy in the anorectal department,and effectively reduced the hospitalization cost of patients.

clinical pharmacistshemorrhoidectomyperioperative periodantibioticsrationality

杨秀、柳露云、张凌雄、张阳、代加奎、杨玉萍

展开 >

云南省老年病医院药剂科,昆明 650011

云南省第三人民医院药剂科,昆明 650011

临床药师 痔切除术 围术期 抗菌药物 合理性

2024

国外医药(抗生素分册)
中国医药集团总公司四川抗菌素工业研究所,中国医学科学院医药生物技术研究所

国外医药(抗生素分册)

影响因子:0.852
ISSN:1001-8751
年,卷(期):2024.45(5)