首页|遮荫及复光对不同类型甘薯产量形成和糖类物质的影响

遮荫及复光对不同类型甘薯产量形成和糖类物质的影响

扫码查看
[目的]研究遮荫及后期复光对不同类型甘薯块根产量和糖类物质的影响,以期为西南低光能辐射地区的甘薯提质增效生产提供理论依据。[方法]以优质食用型甘薯品种烟薯25和鲜食加工兼用型甘薯品种徐紫薯8号为试验材料,于大田常规密度(60000株/ha)下设3个光照/遮荫处理:(1)全生育期自然光对照(CK);(2)栽种后50 d至收获期持续遮光40%(S处理);(3)栽种后50 d开始40%遮荫,持续40 d后复光(R处理),于遮荫前1 d(T1时期)、遮荫第40 d(T2时期)、遮荫第80 d(T3时期)和遮荫第120 d收获期(T4时期)分别进行取样分析,对比遮荫及复光对甘薯产量、干物质积累与分配、块根糖类物质含量及淀粉品质相关指标的影响。[结果]T4收获期时,烟薯25和徐紫薯8号S处理的鲜薯产量较CK显著降低22。34%和10。78%(P<0。05,下同),R处理的鲜薯产量较CK降低13。28%和2。25%;S和R处理下,烟薯25单株总干重分别较CK显著降低21。60%和18。92%,单株薯块干重分别显著降低和27。80%和18。77%,徐紫薯8号处理间无显著差异(P>0。05,下同)。T2时期,烟薯25和徐紫薯8号的单株叶面积和SPAD值高于CK;烟薯25比叶重显著降低,徐紫薯8号比叶重处理间无显著差异。T3时期,S处理下烟薯25单株叶面积和比叶重与CK无显著差异,SPAD值显著高于CK;徐紫薯8号S处理的单株叶面积和SPAD值显著高于CK,比叶重显著低于CK;R处理下烟薯25的单株叶面积和叶片SPAD值分别较CK显著降低50。92%和5。46%,比叶重显著增加13。03%;徐紫薯8号R处理的单株叶面积较CK显著提高17。37%,比叶重和SPAD值与CK无显著差异。S处理显著提高了收获期烟薯25的可溶性糖、还原糖和蔗糖含量,显著降低了淀粉含量和单株淀粉产量;R处理的可溶性糖和淀粉含量与CK无显著差异。徐紫薯8号收获期S处理的可溶性糖和蔗糖含量较CK显著降低;R处理的可溶性糖含量显著高于S处理,但与CK无显著差异;淀粉含量和单株淀粉产量在各处理间均无显著差异。遮荫处理使甘薯淀粉粒径降低;T4收获期,烟薯25淀粉溶解度和膨胀势均表现为S处理>CK>R处理,且各处理间差异显著,徐紫薯8号淀粉溶解度和膨胀势在各处理间均无显著差异。相关分析结果表明,烟薯25单株薯块干重与单株总干重呈显著或极显著(P<0。01)正相关,徐紫薯8号单株薯块干重与植株物质积累相关指标、糖类物质的相关系数较低。[结论]遮荫导致烟薯25产量降低但会提升其食用品质,后期充足的光照可在保证其品质的前提下弥补前期遮荫造成的产量损失。徐紫薯8号对光环境具有较高的适应性,在长期遮荫和光环境变化下能维持产量稳定,可在光能辐射资源较低的地区种植。
Effects of shading and light restoration on yield formation and sugar substances of different types of sweet potato
[Objective]In order to provide theoretical basis for improving quality and efficiency of sweet potato in low light radiation area of southwestern China,the effects of shading and light restoration on root tuber yield and sugar sub-stances of different types of sweet potato were studied.[Method]High quality edible variety Yanshu 25 and multi-purpose variety Xuzishu 8 were used as test varieties with a planting density of 60000 plant/ha in field.Three light/shading treat-ments were set:(1)Natural light control during the entire planting period(CK);(2)continuous 40%shading from 50 d post planting until harvest(S);(3)40%shading from 50 d after planting,lasted 40 dand then restored light(R).Sam-pling analysis was conducted 1 d before shading(T1 period),40 d after shading(T2 period),80 d after shading(T3 pe-riod),and 120 d after shading(T4 period).The effects of shading and light restoration on yield,dry matter accumulation and distribution,root tuber sugar substances content and starch quality of sweet potato were compared.[Result]During the T4 harvest period,the fresh tuber root yield of Yanshu 25 and Xuzishu 8 treated with S treatment was significantly de-creased by 22.34%and 10.78%compared with CK(P<0.05,the same below),and the fresh tuber root yield of R treat-ment was decreased by 13.28%and 2.25%compared with CK.Under S and R treatments,the total dry weight per plant of Yanshu 25 was significantly decreased by 21.60%and 18.92%compared with CK,and the root tuber dry weight per plant was significantly decreased by 27.80%and 18.77%respectively.There was no significant difference between the treat-ments of Xuzishu 8(P>0.05,the same below).At T2 period,the leaf area per plant and SPAD values of Yanshu 25 and Xuzishu 8 were higher than those of CK.The specific leaf weight of Yanshu 25 was significantly decreased,but there was no significant difference between the treatments of Xuzishu 8.At T3 period,the leaf area and specific leaf weight of Yanshu 25 were not significantly different from CK under S treatment,and the SPAD value was significantly higher than CK.The leaf area per plant and SPAD value of Xuzishu 8 treated with S treatment were significantly higher than CK,and the specific leaf weight was significantly lower than CK.Under R treatment,the leaf area per plant and leaf SPAD value of Yanshu 25 were significantly decreased by 50.92%and 5.46%compared with CK respectively,and specific leaf weight was significantly increased by 13.03%.Compared with CK,the leaf area per plant of Xuzishu 8 treated with R treatment was significantly increased by 17.37%,and the specific leaf weight and SPAD value were not significantly different from CK.S treatment significantly increased the contents of soluble sugar,reducing sugar and sucrose in Yanshu 25,and sig-nificantly decreased the starch content and starch yield per plant.The contents of soluble sugar and starch in R treatment were not significantly different from those in CK.The contents of soluble sugar and sucrose in S treatment of Xuzishu 8 during harvesting period was significantly decreased than that in CK.The soluble sugar content of R treatment was signifi-cantly higher than that of S treatment,but there was no significant difference between R treatment and CK.There was no significant difference in starch content and starch yield per plant among different treatments.Shading treatment reduced the particle size of sweet potato starch.At T4 harvest period,the solubility and swelling power of starch of Yanshu 25 were as follows:S treatment>CK>R treatment,and there were significant differences among all treatments.There were no significant differences in solubility and swelling power of starch of Xuzishu 8 among all treatments.The results of cor-relation analysis showed that the root tuber dry weight per plant of Yanshu 25 was significantly or extremely significantly(P<0.01)positively correlated with the total dry weight per plant,and the correlation coefficients between root tuber dry weight per plant and plant material accumulation,sugar substance of Xuzizhu 8 was low.[Conclusion]Shading reduces the yield of Yanshu 25 but improves edible quality.Sufficient light in the later period can make up for the yield loss caused by the early shading under the premise of ensuring its quality.Xuzishu 8 has high adaptability to the light environment,and can maintain stable yield under long-term shading and light environment changes.It can be planted in areas with low light energy radiation resources.

sweet potatoshadinglight restorationdry matter accumulation and distributionsugar substancesstarch

李永鹏、龚凡婷、冉腾飞、肖力力、夏茹、杨才、黄安柱、高娅、杨玉权、田山君

展开 >

贵州大学农学院,贵州 贵阳 550025

自然资源部四川基础地理信息中心,四川 成都 610041

甘薯 遮荫 复光 干物质积累与分配 糖类物质 淀粉

2024

南方农业学报
广西壮族自治区农业科学院

南方农业学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.83
ISSN:2095-1191
年,卷(期):2024.55(11)