首页|大数据差异定价的法律规制——以个人信息保护为视角

大数据差异定价的法律规制——以个人信息保护为视角

扫码查看
大数据差异定价的本质就是企业对消费者个人信息的收集、处理行为,因而通过个人信息保护的途径规制大数据差异定价,较为合理。美国《消费者隐私权利法案(草案)》在规定"透明度""用户控制"等"知情同意"要求的同时,引入"场景判断"规则,在无需消费者同意的情形下,以动态方式考察企业的数据收集处理行为在特定场景中是否具有"合理性"。考虑到"知情同意"的独特价值,《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法(以下简称《个保法》)在规制大数据差异定价行为时仍应适用知情同意原则。与此同时,参考美国立法,《个保法》可于"知情同意"之外,将企业是否履行以"个人信息保护影响评估"为核心的义务群,作为大数据差异定价合法性的判断标准。
Legal Regulation on Using Big Data for Differential Pricing:From the Perspective of Personal Information Protection
The essence of using big data for differential pricing is the behavior of an enterprise to collect and process consumers'information,so it is reasonable to regulate this type of differential pricing through personal information protection.The Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2015 in the U.S.stipulates the requirements of"informed consent"such as"heightened transparency"and"individual control",and introduces the rule of"being reasonable in light of context"to dynamically examine whether an enterprise's data collection and processing behavior is"reasonable"in a specific scenario without the consumer's consent.Considering the unique value of"informed consent",Personal Information Protection Law of the People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Personal Information Protection Law)shall apply the principle of informed consent when regulating the act of using big data for differential pricing.In addition to the principle of"informed consent",the Personal Information Protection Law should also refer to the U.S.legislation and regard whether an enterprise has performed its obligations with the"personal information protection impact assessment"as the core as another standard for the legitimacy of using big data for differential pricing.

differential pricingpersonal information protectioninformed consentbe reasonable in light of context

梁恒奕

展开 >

贵州警察学院,贵州 贵阳 550005

差异定价 个人信息保护 知情同意 场景判断

2024

贵州警察学院学报
贵州警官职业学院

贵州警察学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.213
ISSN:1671-5195
年,卷(期):2024.36(1)
  • 9