首页|刑事案件中被害人过错的认定

刑事案件中被害人过错的认定

扫码查看
司法实践中将伦理过错认定为被害人过错,混淆了案发原因与被害人过错。案件起因与犯罪动机相关,是判断行为人主观恶性的指标;被害人过错则与因果关系、结果产生相关,是关乎刑事责任分配的衡量要素。由于被害人过错能够对行为不法与有责性判断产生实质化的影响,因此,被害人过错的认定应当围绕着因果关系展开。一是被害人过错应当是"着手实行—结果"因果关系中的被害人言行,而行为之前、结果之后的被害人言行不是被害人过错。二是被害人过错必须是对犯罪结果产生提供直接原因力的言行,包括风险升高、实现结果两种行为类型。三是被害人的本能行为、合理合法行为,即便因为介入因果关系对结果产生具有原因力,也不属于被害人过错。
Identification of Victim's Faults in Criminal Cases
Identifying an ethical fault as the victim's fault in judicial practice confuses the cause of a case with the victim's fault.The cause of a case,which is relevant to the criminal motive,is an indicator to judging the perpetrator's subjective malice,while the victim's fault,which is relevant to the causality and the consequence,is a measuring factor for the distribution of criminal responsibilities.As the victim's fault has a substantial impact on judging the perpetrator's wrongdoings and responsibilities,the identification of victim's fault should take into account the causality of constituent elements.First,the victim's fault should be the victim's words and deeds in the causality of"starting a criminal act to causing consequences",while the victim's words and deeds before and after a criminal act shall not be the victim's fault.Second,the victim's fault must be words and deeds that provide direct causes for criminal consequences,including two types of behavior,namely the behavior to increase risks and the behavior to achieve results.Third,when the victim's behavior is instinctive,reasonable and legal,even if the intervention of causality exerts a causal effect on the consequences,it should not be judged as the victim's fault.

victim's faultcausalitycriminal motivationethical fault

蒋涤非

展开 >

云南省人民检察院,云南 昆明 650228

被害人过错 因果关系 犯罪动机 伦理过错

2024

贵州警察学院学报
贵州警官职业学院

贵州警察学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.213
ISSN:1671-5195
年,卷(期):2024.36(2)
  • 19