摘要
著录于明代中期的笔记《立斋闲录》建文史部分保存了许多一手材料.但在今存《立斋闲录》各版本中,建文史部分的编次和内容差异较为明显,此前未厘清其演变过程.从编次的方式来看,《立斋录》与辽宁图书馆藏本《立斋闲录》应为将建文史作为专题录入的早期版本,其他版本则是以时序重排的晚期版本.从内容来看,《立斋录》是最接近原本的版本,所用史料也比较准确;辽宁图书馆藏本《立斋闲录》的高巍上书部分出现不少纰误.另外,晚期本中不见著于早期本的传记材料,主要从更晚的著述中另取.晚期本虽有完善之意,但引文来源、史事考证、编撰方式等方面仍有许多不足,史料价值有所降低.
Abstract
The Emperor Jianwen's History section of the note LizhaiXianlu,which was recorded in the middle of the Ming Dynasty,preserves a lot of first-hand materials.However,in the existing versions of LizhaiXianlu,there are obvious differences in the order and content of the Jianwenshi part,and the evolution process has not been clarified before.From the point of view of the way of editing,LizhaiLu and LiZhaiXianLu in the collection of Liaoning Library should be the early version of the entry of Jianwen's history as a special topic,and the other versions are the late version of the chronological rearrangement.From the content point of view,LizhaiLu is the closest version to the original version,and the historical materials which were used are also more accurate.There are many mistakes in the high-profile book part of LiZhaiXianLu in the collection of Liaoning Library.In addition,the biographical materials in the late edition are not found in the early ones,and they are mainly taken from the later works.Although the late version is perfect or completed,there are still many deficiencies in the source of citations,historical research,compilation methods,etc.,and the value of historical materials has been reduced.