首页|"管仲之器小哉"辨正

"管仲之器小哉"辨正

扫码查看
《论语·八佾》篇有"管仲之器小哉"一章,其中"器"字何晏、朱熹理解为"器量""局量",其他各家理解为"器用""器才(材)"."器"字在现存先秦文献中没有"器量""局量"等词义,何晏、朱熹之训诂没有文献根据.根据孔子对管仲存亡继绝之历史功绩的评价和史料对管仲政治成就的记载,评价管仲为"器用小"或"器才(材)小",是不合理的.清华简第六辑《管仲》篇有管仲言论作"既佞又仁,此谓成器",当是《八佾》此章孔子和"或曰"者对话的背景和前提,"管仲之器小哉"当读为"管仲之'器'小哉",理解为"管仲所说的'成器'太狭隘了吧".孔子对管仲关于"成器"的定义持否定态度,大概源于二人的思想观念有所不同.
A Probe into the Statement of"Guan Zhong Zhi Qi Xiao Zai"
There has always been different interpretations of the character"Qi(器)"in Ba Yi,Analects of Confucius.He Yan and Zhu Xi interpreted it as"tolerance",while other scholars claimed that it meant"qualification".The character"Qi(器)",however,has never been explained either as"tolerance"nor as"qualification"in any Pre-Qin literature,so there was no literary basis for He Yan and Zhu Xi's interpretation.What's more,according to documents,Confucius thought high of Guan Zhong's historical achievements in such political accomplishments as saving his country,so it's unreasonable for him to interpret"Qi Xiao"as"not tolerant"or"not qualified".In the 6th volume of Tsinghua Bamboo Slips,Guan Zhong asserted that"one can be considered as Qi when he is both cunning and benevolent".This assertion should be considered as the background and context of interpreting Ba Yi.With this being a premise,it is safe to interpret the statement of"Guan Zhong Zhi Qi Xiao Zai"as"Guan Zhong's definition of'Cheng Qi(成器,growing up to be a useful person)'is too narrow".Confucius'making negative comment on Guan Zhong's understanding of"Cheng Qi",the author believes,is caused by his different ideology from that of Guan Zhong.

Analects of ConfuciusTsinghua Bamboo SlipsGuan ZhongQiQi Xiao

孙永波

展开 >

山东大学文学院语言科学实验中心,山东济南 250100

《论语》 清华简 《管仲》 "器小"

2024

管子学刊
齐文化研究院

管子学刊

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.116
ISSN:1002-3828
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 3