首页|材朴与心知之合:论荀子式的美德论建构

材朴与心知之合:论荀子式的美德论建构

扫码查看
关于荀子美德论建构问题,森舸澜区分了内在主义和外在主义,认为美德的修养需要依赖内在的向善倾向,而不能仅仅依靠外在利益和目标.荀子不支持内在道德倾向,故而森舸澜批评荀子实际上暗中引入了内在主义理论.我们将回应其内在和外在主义的划分,并论证荀子完全可能承认人性中具有培养美德可资利用的内在材料、要素或倾向.荀子的成善、成德理论离不开心知对有利于道德的自然情感的认知、肯定、珍视和尊重,属于有知之善,而区别于孟子作为无知之善的四端自然萌发的生长式图像.荀子的心知不仅包含反思性的知、经验性的知以及默会的知,而且还须具有道德创造能力和总体视角能力,这对实现荀子式的心性转化是必要的.最后,我们试图提供一幅以"心知一材朴"为核心的兼内外的荀子式美德论建构图像.
Integrating Nature with Nurturing:The Approach Proposed by Xun Tzu to Cultivating Virtue
Based on his belief that virtue should be obtained through both internal and external transformation,Edward Slingerland argued that Xun Tzu was not sound enough in asserting that external interests or goals was the only driving force for virtue-cultivating while ignored the role of internal morality.Xun Tzu,according to Slingerland,covertly adopted an intrinsic approach in his proposal for virtue-cultivating in a seemingly external way.This paper addresses Slingerland's opinion and tries to prove that it's quite feasible for Xun Tzu to acknowledge that intrinsic morality within human nature can be utilized in cultivating virtues.Xun Tzu's theory of moral development and cultivation of virtues is inseparable from cognition,affirmation,appreciation,and respect for intrinsic morality which falls under the category of knowledge based on goodness,contrasting against Mencius'view of innate,natural virtues.This paper claims that apart from wisdom cultivated through reflection,experience,there should also be the cultivation of ability of moral creativity and holistic perspective,which is vital to virtue nurturing.This paper also presents a comprehensive image of the approach proposed by Xun Tzu to cultivating virtue centered on"nurturing-nature",incorporating both intrinsic and extrinsic elements.

Xun Tzuvirtuenatureevil natureraw material and simplicitytransformation of human nature

冯硕

展开 >

中国人民大学哲学院,北京 100872

荀子 美德 性恶 材朴 化性

中国人民大学2023年度中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)特色发展引导专项

2024

管子学刊
齐文化研究院

管子学刊

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.116
ISSN:1002-3828
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 5