首页|论"名动包含"说的理据及其所面临的难题

论"名动包含"说的理据及其所面临的难题

扫码查看
本文从语义类型角度出发,讨论"名动包含"说的成因,关注"零句"说之下"名动包含"说的推导过程以及名词成分和动词成分指称性的由来.本文指出:类型为e的指称语、类型为t的命题或类型为<st,t>的命题集合均可以做话题;英语中-ing可以是区分主要动词和次要动词的一种句法手段,不一定意味着所附着的动词在主宾语位置需要经历指称化过程;动词"是"后的成分在等值结构和述谓结构中为不同的语义类型,并不都具有指称性;而正是由于名词成分语义类型的多样性,不同句法类别在语义类型保持一致的情况下可以形成并列;即使假设动词成分事件化后具有指称性,能够指称事件个体,它与其他词类的指称语也是不同的,相互之间也是形成平行关系,而不是包含关系.
On the Motivations and Related Issues of Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis
From the perspective of semantic type,this paper discusses the rationale of Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis,its derivative process in the framework of minor sentences,and the origin of the referentiality of the nominal and verbal elements.It is pointed out that expressions of type e,propositions of type t and sets of propositions of type<st,t>can all be the topic of a sentence.In English,-ing is a syntactic means of differentiating finite verbs from non-finite verbs and does not necessarily imply that verbs with the-ing pattern need to undergo a process of nominalization when appearing in the subject or object position.In Chinese,the elements following the verb shi are of different semantic types,e.g.identificational and the predicational,and they are not all referential.And because of the diversity of semantic types of noun phrases,different syntactic categories can be juxtaposed while maintaining the same semantic type.Even if it is assumed that verbs can refer to events when nominalized,their references are still in parallel with those of other categories,and cannot form the inclusive relationship.

minor sentencesNoun-verb Inclusion Hypothesistopicreferentialitysemantic types

潘海华、孙帆

展开 >

香港中文大学语言学与现代语言系 999077

北京语言大学语言科学院 100083

零句 名动包含 话题 指称性 语义类型

国家社科基金重大项目

22&ZD295

2024

汉语学报
华中师范大学

汉语学报

CSSCI北大核心
影响因子:0.469
ISSN:1672-9501
年,卷(期):2024.(3)
  • 13