首页|否定与强调的多声关联——基于"并"与"绝"的对比考察

否定与强调的多声关联——基于"并"与"绝"的对比考察

扫码查看
"并"与"绝"作为否定极项,普遍认为它们有加强否定、强调语气的作用,但途径和方式不一.首先,两者拥有不同的多声对话关系:前者以"现实"反驳预期,是现实对预期的转折;后者否认预期的可能性与合理性,却不一定反预期.其次,尽管语义场景和否定词、情态词都明确提示了现实性差异:"并"的典型表达是现实场景,而"绝"为非现实场景,但大量语料证明直陈事件是双方共享的语义表达.因此,"并"与"绝"的根本区别不在于本身的现实性,而在于其所投射的叙实性:"并"不仅句法上排斥典型非现实语境,而且无论是否真实,都带来叙实义解读;"绝"与此相反,即使否定现实场景也仍有非叙实意义.最后,它们都体现了超越二元互动关系的多维视角,标记了话语行为主体协调不同观点、评估双方心理状态的过程,是多声性的来源和本质.
Polyphonic Relations Between Negative Structures and Emphatic Expressions:A Comparative Study of Bing and Jue
Bing and Jue as negative polarity items(NPI)are commonly believed to intensify negation and emphasize tone,but they differ in approach and manner.Firstly,they play different roles in dialogue.Bing refutes expectations with"the reality",serving as a turning point from expectation to reality;jue denies the possibility and reasonableness of expectations without necessarily countering expectations.Secondly,semantic cues from negation and modal words all show their differences clearly:bing expresses realis scenarios,while jue represents irrealis situations.However,a substantial corpus demonstrates that both adverbs can be used in shared semantic expressions.We find that the fundamental distinction between bing and jue lies not in their inherent realism but in the projected narrative perspective.Bing not only syntactically excludes typical realis contexts but also brings about a narrative interpretation,whether true or not;jue,even when denying realis scenarios,holds an irrealis meaning.Lastly,they both reflect multidimensional perspectives beyond a binary interaction,indicating the process of coordinating different viewpoints and evaluating participants'psychological states,which is the source and nature of polyphony.

NPI bing and juepolyphonyfacticityfactivitynarrative perspective

鲁莹

展开 >

北京联合大学师范学院/国家语言文字推广基地 100011

否定极项"并"/"绝" 多声性 现实性 叙实性 叙事视角

国家社科基金

19BYY173

2024

汉语学报
华中师范大学

汉语学报

CSSCI北大核心
影响因子:0.469
ISSN:1672-9501
年,卷(期):2024.(3)
  • 13