首页|再谈《金瓶梅》传世的第一信息答周钧韬先生

再谈《金瓶梅》传世的第一信息答周钧韬先生

扫码查看
本来,认为袁中郎的《董思白》一信写于万历二十四年,是所有袁中郎研究者的共识,也并非是韩南、魏子云两先生的独创.只要承认这一系年,那《金瓶梅》传世的第一信息就在这一年,无可争辩.周先生为了挑战这一说法,特别挑出了韩南、魏子云两位先生的大名,无非是为了表示"自觉追求""与权威的论争中创新"是他从事研究的"信条".但妙的是,他用以否定"万历二十四年"的立论根据,恰恰是用了韩、魏的所谓"共游"说,而这个"共游"说又恰恰是被他硬按给韩、魏头上的,无非是借用这两"权威"来为自己壮色.这就在同一个问题上,他处在既要挑战两权威,又要借重两权威的矛盾境地.在论述中,不但虚造了韩南说过"共游洞庭山"的话,而且又误读或曲解了一系列的文章.其关键是,陶石篑两次来苏州,明说万历二十三年的那次没有游洞庭,二十四年他带了一批亲朋好友游洞庭.袁中郎的诗文谈及二十四年陶游洞庭时,都表明自己在病中,未曾陪同.袁中郎另有一篇《西洞庭》写的是后来他一人游洞庭.所以,陶与袁从未"共游"过洞庭.周先生既没有读懂《董思白》,又误读了《西洞庭》,在虚构的韩、魏"共游"说的引导下,就咬定陶、袁"共游"过;既然他们"共游"过,那不是二十四年,就一定是二十三年了.于是"第一信息"就来自万历二十三年了.从中可见,做学问不能从打倒权威出发,而是要从求真求实出发.用材料说话,还要读懂材料,要有实事求是的学风.写这篇文章,特与周先生共勉.
On the First Information of the Jin Ping Mei to reply Mr.Zhou Juntao
Originally,it is a consensus of all researchers on Yuan Zhonglang that the letter Dong Sibai was written in the 24th year of Wanli,and it is not the original creation of Han Nan and Wei Ziyun.As long as we admit it,it is indisputable that the first information of Jin Ping Mei is in this year.In order to challenge this viewpoint,Mr.Zhou specially picked out the names of Han Nan and Wei Ziyun,which was nothing more than to show that his"conscious pursuit"and"innovation in the debate with authorities"is his"belief"in his research.But interestingly,the basis of his argument to negate"the 24th year of Wanli"is precisely the so-called"tour Dongting Mountain together"of Han and Wei,which was precisely pressed on the heads of Han and Wei by him.It was nothing more than borrowing these two"authorities"to make himself proud.On the same issue,he was in a contradictory situation of both challenging two authorities and relying on them.In the discussion,not only he fabricated Han Nan who said"tour Dongting Mountain together",but also misread or misinterpreted a series of articles.The key is that Tao Shikui came to Suzhou twice,and clearly said that he did not tour Dongting in the 23rd year of Wanli.It was in the 24th year he took a group of friends and relatives to tour Dongting.When Yuan Zhonglang talked about the 24th year of Tao's tour of Dongting,he showed that he was ill and did not accompany him.Yuan Zhonglang also had an article named West Dongting,it was said that he toured Dongting himself.Therefore,Tao and Yuan never toured Dongting Mountain together.Mr.Zhou did not understand Dong Sibai,and misread the West Dongting.In the fictional Han,Wei toured Dongting Mountain together,under the guidance of this,he asserted Tao,Yuan toured Dongting Mountain together;since they toured Dongting Mountain together,it was not 24th,it must be 23rd.Then he deemed that the"first information"of Jin Ping Mei was the 23rd years of Wanli.It was obvious that learning can not start from overthrowing the authority,but to rely on fact and truth.Speaking with the material,and also to understand the material,there must be a realistic attitude to study.By writing this article to encourage Mr.Zhou and myself.

the first information of Jin Ping MeiYuan ZhonglangTao ShikuiHan NanWei ZiyunZhou Juntao

黄霖

展开 >

复旦大学 中国语言文学研究所,上海 200433

《金瓶梅》传世的第一个信息 袁中郎 陶石篑 韩南 魏子云 周钧韬

2024

陕西理工大学学报(社会科学版)
陕西理工学院

陕西理工大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.265
ISSN:2096-4005
年,卷(期):2024.42(1)
  • 9