首页|刑事违法性判断必然受制于其他部门法吗?——破解"法秩序统一性原理"的迷思

刑事违法性判断必然受制于其他部门法吗?——破解"法秩序统一性原理"的迷思

扫码查看
刑事违法性判断在多大程度上受到其他部门法内容的制约,取决于应当如何正确理解刑事违法性判断的体系性要求。有学者认为应当同时考虑刑法内部体系和跨部门法外部体系,但这种看法忽视了两种体系存在不可通约性,没有中立的权衡点,必须重构为一个体系。所谓法秩序统一性原理的诸多版本都可以被视作对体系性要求的不同重构,要判断何者正确,必须回归刑事违法性判断本身的性质。刑事违法性判断蕴含三重宣称:原则融贯性宣称、道德正确性宣称与公共性宣称。其中,原则融贯性宣称是任何法律判断的内在宣称,因为法概念内在蕴含朝向法治的理想维度。道德正确性宣称与公共性宣称则是刑事违法性判断的特有宣称,前者指刑法主张刑事违法性的本质并非违反刑法,而是违反先于刑法存在的特定类型的道德规范;后者指刑法主张自身代表政治共同体的公共立场而非任何私人立场。上述三重宣称结合,意味着刑事违法性判断本质上是一种半制度化的公民道德体系判断,刑事不法即公民不法。这将导向一种独特的刑法内部体系立场:刑法并非后置法,刑事违法性判断并不直接受到其他部门法内容硬性约束,相反其他部门法要尊重刑法内部体系立场,但同时政治共同体的公民道德限定了刑法边界。
Is the Judgment of Criminal Illegality Necessarily Constrained by the Evaluation of Other Areas of Law?——Debunking the Myth of"The Principle of the Unity of Legal Order"
The extent to which the judgment of criminal illegality is constrained by the content of other areas of law depends on how to correctly understand the requirement of systematization for judgment of criminal illegality.Many versions of the so-called principle of unity of legal order can be regarded as different interpretations of the requirement of systematization.To judge which is correct,it is necessary to return to the nature of criminal illegality judgment itself.The judgment of criminal illegality contains three claims:the claim of coherence of principles,the claim of moral correctness and the claim of publicity.Among them,the principle coherence claim is an inevitable claim of any legal judgment,because the concept of law inherently implies an ideal dimension towards the rule of law.The claim of moral correctness and the claim of publicity are the unique claims of the judgment of criminal illegality.The former means that the criminal law must assert that the essence of criminal illegality is not a violation of the criminal law,but a violation of the moral norms that exist before the criminal law;the latter means that the criminal law must assert that it represents the public position of the political community rather than any private position.The combination of the above three claims means that the judgment of criminal illegality is essentially a semi-institutional judgment of the civic morality system,and criminal illegality is civic wrongness.This will lead to a unique internal system position of criminal law:criminal law is not a post-law,and the judgment of criminal illegality is not directly and rigidly constrained by the content of other areas of law.On the contrary,other areas fo law should respect the internal system position of criminal law,but at the same time the civic morality of the political community limits the boundaries of the criminal law.

criminal illegalitycoherence of principlesinternal systemexternal systemcivic morality

张峰铭

展开 >

中共中央党校(国家行政学院)政治和法律教研部,北京 100091

刑事违法性 原则融贯性 内部体系 外部体系 公民道德

2022年度国家社会科学基金青年项目

22CFX003

2024

河北法学
河北政法职业学院 河北省法学会

河北法学

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.992
ISSN:1002-3933
年,卷(期):2024.42(3)
  • 74