首页|刑事诉讼模式转型的"中间状态":听取意见式司法的兴起

刑事诉讼模式转型的"中间状态":听取意见式司法的兴起

扫码查看
听取意见式司法是刑事诉讼从"行政化裁决模式"向"诉讼化裁决模式"转型的中间状态。我国刑事诉讼制度的诸多弊端无法用"强职权主义"诉讼模式予以解释,司法程序面临的首要课题是"诉讼化改革"的问题。听取意见式司法突破了原有的"行政化"程序构造,形成了新的司法秩序,具有媒介性、两重性和依附性的特征,为观察"诉讼化改革"的实践和诉讼模式转型提供了一个独特的视角。听取意见式司法有三条清晰的法理脉络支撑:服务于职权活动与诉讼效率的"权力逻辑";促进诉权导入和诉讼参与的"权利逻辑";旨在强化诉讼合意与理性决策的"沟通逻辑"。即使面临自身难以避免的"内生性约束"以及运行环境失衡的"结构性约束",听取意见式司法也为"通过听证的方式听取意见"奠定规范基础,将听取意见的主体关系锚定在控辩裁三方之上,有效维护了"诉讼化改革"的核心结构。从听取意见到"刑事听证",再到程序的"诉讼化"运作,是我国刑事诉讼模式转型的本土经验。合作式司法是反思对抗性司法弊端的产物,听取意见式司法则致力于发展完整的对抗性司法,二者达成合意的基础和方式并不相同。
The Intermediate State of the Transformation of Criminal Procedure Mode:the Rise of the Judicature of Hearing Opinions
The judicature of hearing opinions is the intermediate state of the transformation of criminal procedure from administrative adjudication mode to litigious adjudication mode.Many drawbacks of our criminal procedure system can not be explained by the strong inquisitorial system litigation mode,and the primary task facing the judicial procedure is the litigation reform.The judicature of hearing opinions breaks through the original administrative procedure structure and forms a new judicial order,which has the characteristics of media,duality and dependency,and provides a unique perspective for observing the practice of litigation reform and the transformation of litigation mode.There are three clear lines of jurisprudence supporting the judicature of hearing opinions:the power logic which serves the functions and the efficiency of litigation,the right logic which promotes the introduction of litigation rights and participation in litigation,and the communication logic which aims at strengthening the agreement of litigation and rational decision-making.Even in the face of its own unavoidable endogenous constraints and the structural constraints of the unbalanced operating environment,the judicature of hearing opinions also lays a normative foundation for hearing opinions by way of hearing,anchors the subject relationship of hearing opinions on the three parties,and effectively maintains the core structure of litigation reform.From listening to opinions to criminal hearing and then to the litigious operation of the procedure,it is the native experience of our country's criminal litigation mode transformation.Cooperative justice is the product of reflecting on the disadvantages of adversarial justice,while the judicatory of hearing opinions is committed to developing a complete adversarial justice.The basis and way of reaching agreement between the two are different.

judicature by hearing opinionsadministrative adjudication modelitigation adjudi-cation modelprocuratorial hearingnegotiated justice

刘金松

展开 >

重庆大学法学院,重庆 400044

听取意见式司法 行政化裁决模式 诉讼化裁决模式 检察听证 协商性司法

北京市社会科学基金一般项目

19FXB011

2024

河北法学
河北政法职业学院 河北省法学会

河北法学

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.992
ISSN:1002-3933
年,卷(期):2024.42(8)
  • 38