首页|民事既判事项的权威效力:一种更为确切的界定

民事既判事项的权威效力:一种更为确切的界定

扫码查看
界定既判事项权威效力的经典公式"三重同一性"原则已被司法实践证明充满了陷阱和不明确之处,特别是对象与原因两个概念无法真正限定既判事项的范围.因此有必要重新树立界定的标准,以降低这一制度的不确定性.应当明确规定,禁止当事人向法官重新提出已经法庭辩论且已被法院解决的事项;同时也应当明确规定失权规则,其中包括因集中诉争事项的负担而引发的实体性失权和以默示方式排除某些程序性因素的程序性失权,但法官有权力在满足特定条件时使当事人免于上述失权.
For a More Precise Delimitation of the Authority of Res Judicata in Civil Matters
The classical formula for delimiting the authority of res judicata,based on the principle of"triple identity",has been demonstrated by judicial practice to be fraught with pitfalls and ambiguities,particularly the concepts of object and cause failing to truly delineate the scope of res judicata.Therefore,it is necessary to reinstate delimitation criteria to reduce the uncertainty of this system.It should be clearly stipulated that parties cannot submit to the judge factors that have already been debated and decided by the court;it is also necessary to clearly stipulate the rules of estoppel,which include substantive estoppel resulting from the burden of concentrating the subject matter of the dispute and procedural estoppel that eliminates certain procedural elements by preclusion,with the understanding that the power remains reserved to the judge to relieve the parties from these estoppels under certain conditions.

the authority of res judicatathe subject of disputethe cause of the demandsubstantial foreclosureprocedural foreclosure

亨利·莫图尔斯基、吴沣桦

展开 >

巴黎第十大学,巴黎

北京理工大学法学院,北京 100081

既判事项的权威效力 诉讼对象 诉讼原因 实体性失权 程序性失权

2024

河北法学
河北政法职业学院 河北省法学会

河北法学

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.992
ISSN:1002-3933
年,卷(期):2024.42(12)