刑事印证证明的实践反思与规范展开
Practice Reflection and Normative Application of Criminal Corroboration
张庆立1
作者信息
- 1. 华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海 201620
- 折叠
摘要
印证证明从属于自由心证,现有的印证规范覆盖面不足,故印证既非证明模式,也非证明规则.有效印证既要考虑印证的前提条件,也要考虑单一证据的可靠性,还要考虑逻辑经验的实质检验,故不宜将错误印证导致的冤假错案归咎于印证本身.印证证明不等于证明标准,故证明标准印证化和印证证明标准化都是不可取的.为正确适用刑事印证,建议将"多元论"作为理论基础,将"提升证据证明力"作为价值基础,并坚持"严格印证"与"宽松印证"相结合,"由证到供的证供一致"与"由供到证的供证一致"相结合的具体适用原则.
Abstract
Corroboration is subordinate to free proof.The coverage of existing corroboration provisions is insufficient,so it is neither proof mode nor proof rule.Effective corroboration should consider not only the prerequisite of corroboration,but also the reliability of a single evi-dence,as well as the material test of logic and experience,so it is not appropriate to attribute the wrongful and false cases caused by the wrong application of corroboration to corroboration itself.Corroboration is not equal to the proof standard,so it is not advisable to confuse the proof stan-dard with Corroboration in practice.In order to correctly apply criminal corroboration,it is sug-gested to take"pluralism"as the theoretical basis,"improving the credibility of evidence"as the value basis,and adhere to the specific application principles of"strict corroboration"and"loose corroboration","from evidence to confession"and"from confession to evidence".
关键词
刑事印证/证明模式/冤假错案/证明标准/司法适用Key words
Criminal Corroboration/the Mode of Proof/Unjust Case/Standard of Proof/Ju-dicial Application引用本文复制引用
基金项目
最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题(2023)()
上海市检察协会重点课题(2023)(SH2023308)
出版年
2023
NETL
NSTL
万方数据