首页|论食药安全刑附民公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿的法律适用——赔罚关系视角下的代表性案例分析

论食药安全刑附民公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿的法律适用——赔罚关系视角下的代表性案例分析

扫码查看
在食药安全刑附民公益诉讼中,检察机关能否以及如何提起惩罚性赔偿,在理论上和实践中都存在较大争议.食药安全刑附民公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿呈现政策性文件支持导向明显,而法律中直接请求权规范缺失的现状.这导致在司法实践中审判机关对检察机关的惩罚性赔偿诉讼请求裁判不一.检察机关出于维护公共利益的目的和行使法律监督职能的要求,是提起惩罚性赔偿的适格主体.基于惩罚性赔偿的民事责任性质,惩罚性赔偿金不应与刑事罚金"竞合",不应相互抵扣,应当缴付至专门公益基金以支持食药安全公益事业.
On the Legal Application of Punitive Damages in the Civil Public Interest Litigation Attached to Criminal Cases Related to Food and Drug Safety
In the civil public interest litigation attached to criminal cases related to food and drug safety,there are great controversies in theory and practice about whether and how procurat-orates can claim punitive damages.The legislative status quo of punitive damages in civil public interest litigation attached to criminal cases in food and drug safety is that the supporting orien-tation of policy documents is obvious,but the direct claim right norms are lacking in law,so that the courts have different judgments on the claim for punitive damages of procuratorates injudi-cial practice.In order to safeguard public interests and exercise the function of legal supervision,the procuratorates are the appropriate subjects to claim punitive damages.Based on the nature of civil liability of punitive damages,punitive damages should not be"concurrent"with criminal fines,should not be deducted from each other,and should be paid to a special public welfare fund to support the public welfare undertakings of food and drug safety.

Food and Drug SafetyCivil Public Interest Litigation Attached to Criminal CasesPunitive DamagesSeparation of Compensation and Punishment

聂圣、袁佳煜

展开 >

华中师范大学法学院,湖北武汉 430079

湖北省鄂州市人民检察院,湖北鄂州 436000

食药安全 刑附民公益诉讼 惩罚性赔偿 赔罚分离

2024

湖北警官学院学报
湖北警官学院

湖北警官学院学报

影响因子:0.203
ISSN:1673-2391
年,卷(期):2024.37(4)