首页|对认罪认罚从宽案件无正当理由上诉的必要抑制

对认罪认罚从宽案件无正当理由上诉的必要抑制

扫码查看
刑事诉讼中只有切实保障被告人上诉权的充分行使,才有可能有效发挥刑事二审程序的救济和纠错功能,确保刑事诉讼实体公正和程序公正的真正实现.但个别认罪认罚从宽案件中,在本来合意的诉讼"氛围"下却出现了部分"自愿"认罪认罚的被告人当一审法院作出从宽处罚后又提出上诉的现象.这不仅会影响认罪认罚从宽制度功能的充分发挥,而且会损害认罪认罚从宽制度所体现的诚信价值.尽管检察机关的"报复性抗诉"对认罪认罚从宽案件中的无正当理由上诉有一定抑制效果,但"报复性抗诉"明显存在法理依据不足的缺陷,不宜作为抑制无正当理由上诉的长效对策.基于认罪认罚从宽制度适用中诚信价值的要求与上诉权保障的需要,在认罪认罚从宽案件中增设上诉理由审查程序,达到对无正当理由上诉进行必要抑制的目的,是一种可行的方案选择.
Necessary Suppression of Appeals without Justification in Confession of Guilt and Leniency of Punishment Cases
In general,effective exercise of the defendant's right of appeal in criminal proceedings is essential for the remedy and correction function of the criminal second-instance procedure,ensuring the realization of substantive and procedural justice.However,in certain cases of leniency for confession and punishment,there have been instances where defendants who"voluntarily"pleaded guilty and then filed an appeal after receiving a lenient sentence in the first-instance court,despite the originally cooperative"atmosphere"of the trial.This not only undermines the full implementation of the leniency system for confession and punishment,but also damages the integrity value it represents.Although the prosecutorial authority's"retaliatory appeal"has a certain deterrent effect on appeals without justification in cases involving leniency for confession and punishment,it is evident that this"retaliatory appeal"is flawed in terms of legal justification and should not be considered a long-term solution to deter appeals without justification.Based on the requirement of integrity value in the application of the leniency system for confession and punishment,as well as the necessity to protect the right of appeal,it is a feasible option to introduce an appellate review procedure in cases involving leniency for confession and punishment,in order to achieve the necessary suppression of appeals without justification.

leniency systeem for confession and punishmentappeals without justification"retaliatory appeal"review of appeal grounds

陈润生、陈玉忠

展开 >

中共保定市委党校 法学教研室,河北 保定 071000

河北大学 法学院,河北 保定 071002

认罪认罚从宽制度 无正当理由上诉 "报复性抗诉" 上诉理由审查

河北省社会科学基金

HB21FX002

2024

河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)
河北科技大学

河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.353
ISSN:1671-1653
年,卷(期):2024.24(2)
  • 21