河北医学2024,Vol.30Issue(8) :1396-1401.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2024.08.031

瑞马唑仑联合阿芬太尼与丙泊酚联合阿芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉在宫腔镜电切手术麻醉中的应用比较

Comparative Study of Remifentanil Combined with Propofol versus Propofol Alone in Anesthesia for Hysteroscopic Electrosurgical Procedures

童彬 吴玥 何睿 韩苗华 张庆兵 程戌春 姚卫东
河北医学2024,Vol.30Issue(8) :1396-1401.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2024.08.031

瑞马唑仑联合阿芬太尼与丙泊酚联合阿芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉在宫腔镜电切手术麻醉中的应用比较

Comparative Study of Remifentanil Combined with Propofol versus Propofol Alone in Anesthesia for Hysteroscopic Electrosurgical Procedures

童彬 1吴玥 1何睿 1韩苗华 1张庆兵 1程戌春 1姚卫东2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 安徽省芜湖市第一人民医院麻醉科,安徽 芜湖 241000
  • 2. 皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院麻醉科,安徽 芜湖 241000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探究在进行宫腔镜电切手术时,麻醉方案采用瑞马唑仑联合阿芬太尼、丙泊酚联合阿芬太尼两种全凭静脉麻醉方案的应用效果.方法:研究时间为2023 年1 月至2023 年6 月,纳入研究对象为107 例宫腔镜电切手术患者,根据随机数字表法分为对照组、观察组.对照组 53 例采用丙泊酚联合阿芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉,观察组54 例采用瑞马唑仑联合阿芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉.比较两组患者的疼痛情况(使用VAS评分评估)、镇静情况(采用 Ramsay 镇静评分评估)、生命体征情况、改良警觉/镇静评分,记录不良反应情况.结果:与对照组相比,观察组在术后 2h 及术后 12h 的 VAS 评分降低(P<0.05),术后2h时的Ramsay镇静评分升高(P<0.05).两组在手术前的HR、SBP、DBP、SPO2 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与对照组患者相比较,观察组患者手术开始后 5min 及术后 2h 的 HR、SBP、DBP、SPO2 水平均升高(P<0.05).两组的VAS评分、Ramsay 镇静评分、生命体征指标均具有显著的组间效应、时间效应及交互效应(P<0.05).观察组患者手术结束后 1min、3min、5min 时 MOAA/S 评分比对照组高(P<0.05).组间不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:瑞马唑仑联合阿芬太尼应用于宫腔镜电切手术麻醉在术后早期具有更好的疼痛控制和镇静效果,且患者恢复清醒状态更快,生命体征水平维持更稳定.

Abstract

Objective:To investigate the application efficacy of two total intravenous anesthesia regi-mens,remifentanil combined with alfentanil versus propofol combined with alfentanil,during hysteroscopic electrosurgical procedures.Methods:From January 2023 to June 2023,a total of 107 patients undergoing hys-teroscopic electrosurgical procedures were included and randomly allocated using a random number table into a control group(n=53)receiving propofol combined with alfentanil anesthesia and an observation group(n=54)receiving remifentanil combined with alfentanil anesthesia.Pain intensity(evaluated using VAS scores),sedation levels(assessed by Ramsay Sedation Scale),vital signs,Modified Aldrete Score(MAS),and ad-verse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:Compared with the control group,the obser-vation group showed significantly lower VAS scores at 2 hours and 12 hours postoperatively(P<0.05)and higher Ramsay Sedation Scale scores at 2 hours postoperatively(P<0.05).There were no significant differ-ences in preoperative heart rate(HR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),and oxygen saturation(SPO2)between the two groups(P>0.05).However,HR,SBP,DBP,and SPO2 levels were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group at 5 minutes after the start of surger-y and at 2 hours postoperatively(P<0.05).Significant group effects,time effects,and interaction effects were observed for VAS scores,Ramsay Sedation Scale scores,and vital signs(P<0.05).The observation group had higher Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation(MOAA/S)scores at 1,3,and 5 mi-nutes after surgery compared to the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Remifentanil combined with alfentanil provides better pain control and sedation during early postoperative period in patients undergo-ing hysteroscopic electrosurgical procedures compared to propofol combined with alfentanil.Patients recover faster to a clear consciousness state,and their vital signs are more stable during anesthesia.

关键词

宫腔镜电切手术/瑞马唑仑/阿芬太尼/丙泊酚/静脉麻醉

Key words

Hysteroscopic electrosurgical procedures/Remifentanil/Alfentanil/Propofol/In-travenous anesthesia

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

2019年安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(201904b11020014)

出版年

2024
河北医学
河北省医学会

河北医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.915
ISSN:1006-6233
段落导航相关论文