首页|基于棒束传热实验的COSINE系统程序验证与确认

基于棒束传热实验的COSINE系统程序验证与确认

Validation and Verification of COSINE Code Based on Rod Bundle Heat Transfer Experiment

扫码查看
为进一步提升软件计算的稳定性和准确性,对COSINE软件中重要的核心模型进行确认、评估与改进,本文采用热工水力软件包COSINE中的系统安全分析程序cosFlow,对核电厂大破口失水事故中堆芯再淹没阶段的热工水力物理过程进行了建模与计算,计算建模根据棒束传热(RBHT)实验进行,并用RBHT实验结果对系统安全分析程序进行检验.计算结果表明,棒束壁面温度变化趋势与实验数据趋势基本契合,即cosFlow能够较为准确地分析大破口失水事故的骤冷前沿过程;但骤冷前沿的推进速度与RBHT的实验结果相比,前期更快后期更慢,推测原因为加热棒轴向温度梯度较大,原程序未加入轴向的热传导模块,因此后续的程序开发与研究将对骤冷前沿的热质传输模型进行改进.
To further improve the stability and accuracy of software calculation,and to confirm,evaluate and improve the important model in the software COSINE,the system safety analysis code cosFlow in the COSINE thermal-hydraulic software package was used to model and calculate the thermal-hydraulic physical process during the core reflooding stage of large-break loss-of-coolant accident(LOCA)in a nuclear power plant.The calculation modeling was based on the Rod Bundle Heat Transfer(RBHT)experiment,and the results of the experiment were used to examine the system safety analysis code.The calculation results show that the change trend of the wall temperature of the rod bundle is basically consistent with the experimental data,indicating that cosFlow can accurately analyze the progress of quench front in the large-break LOCA.However,the progress speed of the quench front is faster in the early stage and slower in the later stage compared to the experimental results of RBHT.It is speculated that this discrepancy may be attributed to the significant axial temperature gradient in the heating rod as well as a lack of axial heat conduction module in the original code.Therefore,the future code development and research will focus on improving the thermal-hydraulic transfer model of the progress of quench front.

COSINE packageRefloodingQuench frontWall temperature

段秉祺、赵萌、张昊、柴翔、杨燕华

展开 >

上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院,上海,200240

COSINE软件包 再淹没 骤冷前沿 壁面温度

上海市浦江人才计划

21PJ1408300

2024

核动力工程
中国核动力研究设计院

核动力工程

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.3
ISSN:0258-0926
年,卷(期):2024.45(1)
  • 20