随意殴打型寻衅滋事罪之保护法益与"随意"要素厘定
The Protection of Legal Interests and Determination of"Arbitrary"Elements in the Crime of Assault and Riot
李振宇1
作者信息
- 1. 广西大学 法学院,广西 南宁 530004
- 折叠
摘要
1997 年《刑法》修订时将寻衅滋事罪从流氓罪中独立出来,但由于条文规定存在太多的价值性判断表述,因此导致无论是在理论研究抑或司法实务都无法对其达成统一意见.争议最大的莫过于构成要件中保护法益的明确和对"随意"一词的理解.从目的解释和体系解释上讲,随意殴打型寻衅滋事罪的保护法益应当限定为"公共场所秩序",将"随意"一词认定为客观要素更符合立法沿革和目的解释.
Abstract
When"The Criminal Law"was revised in 1997,the crime of provocation and disturbance was separated from the crime of hooliganism.However,due to the existence of too many value judgments in the provisions,it was impossible to reach a unified opinion on it in both theoretical research and judicial practice.The biggest controversy lies in the clear protection of legal interests in the constituent elements and the understanding of the term"arbitrary".From the perspective of purpose interpretation and system interpretation,the protection of legal interests in the crime of provocation and trouble caused by arbitrary assault should be limited to"public place order",and recognizing the term"arbitrary"as an objective element is more in line with legislative history and purpose interpretation.
关键词
寻衅滋事罪/随意/构成要件/公共场所秩序/目的解释/体系解释Key words
crime of assault and riot/arbitrary/constituent elements/public place order/purpose interpretation/system interpretation引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据