首页|"律赋非赋"与"唐无赋"之关系阐释

"律赋非赋"与"唐无赋"之关系阐释

扫码查看
元人陈绎曾提出"律赋非赋",明人李梦阳提出"唐无赋",二者都对唐代辞赋创作提出了批评,甚至完全否定了唐赋创作的成就.唐赋受到六朝骈赋和科举制度的影响,律赋和骈赋成为唐赋的代表,追求句式工整、辞采华美、声律和谐,丧失了赋"铺陈"的本义.元明文人在复古运动的影响下,由律转"古",赋学审美导向楚辞、汉赋,古赋受到重视而律赋自然受到排斥,导致"律赋非赋"和"唐无赋"观念的产生.
An Explanation of the Relationship Between"Rhymed Fu not Fu"and"No Fu in Tang Dynasty"
Chen Yizeng,a Yuan Dynasty scholar,once proposed that"rhymed Fu is not Fu",while Li Mengyang,a Ming Dynasty scholar,proposed that"Tang had no fu".Both criticized the creation of Tang poetry and even completely denied the achievements of Tang poetry creation.Tang Fu was influenced by the Bing Fu of the Six Dynasties and the imperial examination system,and the rhymed Fu and Bing Fu became representatives of Tang Fu.They pursued neat sentence structures,beautiful language,and harmonious sound and rhythm,losing the original meaning of Fu's"elaboration".Under the influence of the retro movement,the literati of the Yuan and Ming dynasties shifted their focus from rhyme to antiquity,and the aesthetic direction of Fu studies was towards Chu Ci and Han Fu.Ancient Fu received attention,while rhymed Fu was naturally rejected,leading to the emergence of the concepts of"Rhymed Fu Is not Fu"and"No Fu in Tang Dynasty".

Chen YizengLi Mengyang"No Fu in Tang Dynasty"rhymed Fuancient Fu

姚奎

展开 >

贵州师范大学 文学院,贵州 贵阳 550001

陈绎曾 李梦阳 唐无赋 律赋 古赋

2024

哈尔滨学院学报
哈尔滨学院

哈尔滨学院学报

影响因子:0.269
ISSN:1004-5856
年,卷(期):2024.45(5)