首页|视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者应用雷珠单抗、阿柏西普联合激光光凝术的效果比较

视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者应用雷珠单抗、阿柏西普联合激光光凝术的效果比较

扫码查看
目的 比较应用雷珠单抗、阿柏西普联合激光光凝术治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(central retinal vein occlusion-macular edema,CRVO-ME)的效果.方法 选择 2019 年 2 月~2022 年 3 月本院收治的89例CRVO-ME患者,根据治疗方法不同分为研究组(n=45)与对照组(n=44).对照组接受雷珠单抗联合激光光凝术治疗,研究组接受阿柏西普联合激光光凝术治疗.2组均治疗3个月,比较2 组临床疗效、黄斑中心凹厚度(central macular thickness,CMT)、最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acui-ty,BCVA)、炎症因子、黄斑区微血管参数及并发症发生率,随访1年,记录2组注射次数.结果 2组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后,2组BCVA与CMT均降低(P<0.05),2组治疗后BCVA与CMT比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后,2组可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(soluble inter-cellular adhesion molecule-1,sICAM-1)、肿瘤坏死因子 α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)水平均降低(P<0.05),2组治疗后sICAM-1、TNF-α水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后,2组黄斑中心凹无血管区(foveal avascular zone,FAZ)面积均降低(P<0.05),2组黄斑区视网膜浅层毛细血管网(superfi-cial capillary plexus,SCP)血流密度均升高(P<0.05),2组治疗后FAZ面积、SCP血流密度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).研究组注射次数低于对照组(P<0.05). 2组总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与雷珠单抗联合激光光凝术比较,阿柏西普联合激光光凝术治疗CRVO-ME治疗效果相似,且可减少注射次数.
Comparison of the effect of leizumab and arbocept combined with laser pho-tocoagulation in patients with central retinal vein occlusion-macular edema
Objective To compare the efficacy of leizumab and arbocept combined with laser photocoagulation in patients with central retinal vein occlusion-macular edema(CRVO-ME).Methods A total of 89 patients with CRVO-ME admitted to our hospital from February 2019 to March 2022 were selected and divided into research group(n=45)and control group(n=44)according to different treatment methods.The control group was treated with leizumab com-bined with laser photocoagulation,and the research group was treated with arbocept combined with laser photocoagulation.Both groups were treated for 3 months.The clinical efficacy,cen-tral macular thickness(CMT),best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),inflammatory factors,macular microvascular parameters and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.The patients were followed up for 1 year,and the injection times of the two groups were recorded.Results There was no difference in total effective rate between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,BCVA and CMT were decreased in both groups(P<0.05),and there was no statistical significance in BCVA and CMT between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1(sICAM-1)and tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α)were decreased in 2 groups(P<0.05),but there was no statistical significance in the levels of sICAM-1 and TNF-α between 2 groups(P>0.05).Af-ter treatment,the foveal avascular zone(FAZ)area were decreased in both groups(P<0.05),and the superficial capillary plexus(SCP)blood density were increased in both groups(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in FAZ area and SCP blood den-sity between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).The injection frequency of the study group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).There was no difference in the inci-dence of total complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with leizumab combined with laser photocoagulation,abacept combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of CRVO-ME can achieve similar therapeutic effect and reduce injection fre-quency.

central retinal vein occlusion-macular edemaleizumababersiplaser photocoag-ulationclinical effect

陈海银、储明慧、张晓力

展开 >

扬州大学医学院临床学院海安市中医院眼科,江苏南通 226600

视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿 雷珠单抗 阿柏西普 激光光凝术 临床疗效

江苏省自然科学基金

BK20210095

2024

哈尔滨医科大学学报
哈尔滨医科大学

哈尔滨医科大学学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.117
ISSN:1000-1905
年,卷(期):2024.58(1)
  • 17