首页|后内侧壁骨折块复位固定对PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并后内侧壁骨折的临床效果

后内侧壁骨折块复位固定对PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并后内侧壁骨折的临床效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨后内侧壁骨折块复位固定对股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirota-tion,PFNA)治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并后内侧壁骨折的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析 2020 年 1 月~2022 年1 月沭阳县中医院收治的64 例股骨粗隆间骨折合并后内侧壁骨折患者的资料.所有患者均行PFNA治疗,根据是否采用后内侧壁骨折块复位固定分为未复位组(n=29 例)和复位组(n=35 例).比较2 组患者手术时间、术中出血量、负重时间、骨折愈合时间,髋关节活动度,视觉模拟疼痛评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、髋关节功能评分、下肢功能评分以及并发症发生情况.结果 复位组患者手术时间长于未复位组(P<0.05),2 组术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).复位组患者负重时间、骨折愈合时间均短于未复位组(P<0.05);术后 6 个月,2 组患者髋关节前屈、后伸、外展、内收活动度较术后1 个月均增加(P<0.05),且复位组患者髋关节前屈、后伸、外展、内收活动度高于未复位组(P<0.05);术后3 个月,2 组患者VAS评分较术后10d均降低(P<0.05),且复位组患者VAS评分低于未复位组(P<0.05);术后 6 个月,2 组患者髋关节功能评分、下肢功能评分较术后 1 个月均升高(P<0.05),且复位组患者髋关节功能评分、下肢功能评分均高于未复位组(P<0.05);2 组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 后内侧壁骨折块复位固定用于PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折合并后内侧壁骨折患者,可以加快术后恢复,减轻术后疼痛,改善髋关节和下肢功能,安全可靠.
Clinical effect of posteromedial wall fracture reduction and fixation on PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femoral complicated with posteromedial wall fracture
Objective To explore the clinical effect of medial wall fracture block reduction and fixation on proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)in the treatment of posterior medial wall fracture of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods The data of 64 patients with intertro-chanteric fracture of femur and posterior medial wall fracture admitted to Shuyang County Hos-pital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to January 2022 were analyzed retro-spectively.All patients were treated with PFNA,and they were divided into non reduction group(n=29 cases)and reduction group(n=35 cases)according to receive or not to receive reduction and fixation of medial wall fracture block.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time,weight bearing time,fracture healing time,hip joint mobility,visual analog pain score(VAS),hip joint function score,lower limb function score and complications of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time in the reduction group was lon-ger than that in the non reduction group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding in both groups(P>0.05).The hospitalization time,weight bearing time and fracture healing time of patients in the reduction group were shorter than those in the non reduction group(P<0.05).Six months after operation,the flexion,extension,abduction and adduction of the hip joint in the two groups were increased compared with that in one month af-ter operation(P<0.05),and the flexion,extension,abduction and adduction of the hip joint in the reduction group were higher than those in the non reduction group(P<0.05).After 3 months of operation,VAS scores of patients in both groups were decreased compared with that in 10 days after operation(P<0.05),and VAS scores of patients in reduction group were low-er than those in non reduction group(P<0.05).Six months after operation,the hip joint function score and lower limb function score of patients in both groups increased compared with that in one month after operation(P<0.05),and the hip joint function score and lower limb function score of patients in the reduction group were higher than those in the non reduction group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications be-tween the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The reduction and fixation of medial wall frac-ture block can be used for PFNA treatment of patients with medial wall fracture after intertro-chanteric fracture of femur,and it can accelerate postoperative recovery,reduce postoperative pain,improve hip joint and lower limb function,and it is safe and reliable.

posteromedial wall fracturefracture reductionproximal femoral anti rotation intr-amedullary nailintertrochanteric fracture of femur

张浩、张斌、章其祥、李洪伟

展开 >

徐州医科大学第一临床学院 骨科,江苏 徐州 221004

沭阳县中医院 骨科,江苏 宿迁 223600

徐州医科大学附属医院 骨科,江苏 徐州 221002

后内侧壁骨折 骨折复位 股骨近端防旋髓内钉 股骨粗隆间骨折

江苏省自然科学基金徐州市推动科技创新项目

BK20211043KC19063

2024

哈尔滨医科大学学报
哈尔滨医科大学

哈尔滨医科大学学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.117
ISSN:1000-1905
年,卷(期):2024.58(2)
  • 12