首页|认罪认罚案件中量刑建议调整机制研究

认罪认罚案件中量刑建议调整机制研究

扫码查看
通过对量刑建议调整机制的实证研究,发现机制有检察院和法院均可调整、检察院和法院均基本因案情变化调整等实践特点.结合实践考察结果以及法律规定,该机制在运行中存在检察院的调整权限不明确、"明显不当"的认定标准不清晰、被追诉人与检察院的协商机制不健全等问题.对此,要明确检察院可以自行调整量刑建议,"以案件事实和量刑情节变化为主,调整幅度10%以上为辅"作为判断"明显不当"的标准以及健全控辩双方在调整过程中的协商机制,以完善认罪认罚从宽制度.
Research on Sentencing Suggestion Adjustment Mechanism in the Cases of Pleading Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment
Through empirical research on sentencing suggestion adjustment mechanism,it has been found that the mechanism has practical characteristics such as being adjustable by both procuratorial organs and courts,and being adjusted by both procuratorial organs and courts based on changes in the circumstances of the case.Based on practical investigation results and legal provisions,there are problems in the operation of this mechanism,such as unclear adjustment authority of the procuratorial organs,unclear identification standards for"obvious misconduct",and incomplete negotiation mechanism between the accused and the procuratorial organs.In this regard,it is necessary to clarify that procuratorial organs can adjust sentencing recommendations on their own,with"the main focus being on changes in case facts and sentencing circumstances,supplemented by an adjustment range of more than 10%"as the standard for judging"obvious misconduct",and to improve the negotiation mechanism between the prosecution and defense during the adjustment process,in order to improve the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment.

pleading guilty and acceptance of punishmentadjustment of sentencing suggestionnegotiation between prosecution and defenseobvious misconduct

王强

展开 >

吉林大学司法文明协同创新中心,吉林长春 130012

认罪认罚 量刑建议的调整 控辩协商 "明显不当"

国家社会科学基金重点项目

17AFX015

2024

河南警察学院学报
河南公安高等专科学校

河南警察学院学报

影响因子:0.228
ISSN:1008-2433
年,卷(期):2024.33(1)
  • 26