摘要
20世纪30、40年代的中国,政学两界围绕法律教育问题展开了一场持续时间长、涉及范围广、历史影响大的讨论.因当时法律教育存在"诸事苟且"与"低质量微"弊病,非议与取消法律教育言论渐起.为推进法律教育健康发展,大批学者积极阐述法律教育救国论,从师资、教法与教材三维度归纳提炼域外法律教育的成功经验,从学制、师资、课程设置方面反思梳理本土法律教育问题清单,从人才培养方案、课程设置、教学方法、师资队伍建设以及教育环境改善等方面积极探索优化提升方案等,他们的理论争鸣丰富了近代中国法律教育理论的同时,也为中国法律教育高质量发展提供了方法指导.
Abstract
In the 1930s and 1940s in China,the political and academic circles engaged in a lengthy,wide-ranging,and historically influential discussion on legal education issues.Due to the drawbacks of"neglecting all matters"and"low quality and low quality"in legal education at that time,criticism and cancellation of legal education gradually emerged.In order to promote the healthy development of legal education,a large number of scholars actively elaborated on the value theory that legal education has the potential to save the rule of law in China.They summarized and extract successful experiences of foreign legal education from the perspectives of teachers,teaching methods,and teaching materials.They reflected and sorted out a list of local legal education problems from the aspects of academic system,teachers,and curriculum settings,and actively explored optimization and improvement plans from talents training programs,curriculum settings,teaching methods,teachers team construction,and education environment improvement.Their theoretical debates have enriched the theory of modern Chinese legal education and provided methodological guidance for the high-quality development of Chinese legal education.