首页|算法决策分类分级治理研究

算法决策分类分级治理研究

扫码查看
算法作为人工智能等新一代信息技术的核心,已经深度嵌入商业与公共决策之中,而算法自动化决策主体虚实共存、算法技术更新迭代、因果关系隐秘复杂的属性和运行特征致使传统决策治理架构频繁失效.当前以个体赋权与正当程序控制为主要范式的算法决策治理存在算法决策应用缺乏边界、监管不完备、公开规定不明、责任认定困难等问题.鉴于此,文章基于算法决策分类分级治理在灵活监管、风险识别、差异化处理等方面的优越性,提出在综合考虑算法决策的应用场景和风险程度的基础上构建算法决策分类分级模型,将算法决策划分为四种风险类型,并针对不同风险类型在准入门槛、监管细则、公开层次、责任范围等层面精准设定宽严相济的治理措施,打造场景化和精细化的算法决策治理机制,以回应算法决策架构复杂性和应用场景多元性需求.
Research on Tiered and Classified Governance of Algorithmic Decision-Making
As the core of artificial intelligence and other emerging information technologies,algorithms have been deeply embedded in business and public decision-making.However,the attributes and oper-ational characteristics of algorithmic automated decision-making,such as the coexistence of virtual and real decision-making entities,the iterative update of algorithmic technology,and the hiding and com-plexity of causal relationships,have made traditional decision-making governance architecture fre-quently ineffective.There still exist problems in the current algorithmic decision-making governance,which is mainly based on individual empowerment and due process control,including the lack of boundaries for algorithmic decision-making application,insufficient regulation,unclear public disclo-sure rules,and difficulties in identifying liability.Based on the superiority of tiered and classified al-gorithmic decision-making governance in terms of flexible regulation,risk identification and differenti-ated treatment,this paper constructs a tiered and classified model of algorithmic decision-making that takes into account the application scenarios and risk levels of algorithmic decision-making.The model divides algorithmic decision-making into four types of risk,and sets governance measures combining leniency with severity for different types of risk in view of entry thresholds,regulatory details,public disclosure levels,and scope of liability to create a scenario-based refined algorithmic decision-making governance mechanism in response to the complex architecture and diverse application scenarios of al-gorithmic decision-making.

algorithmic decision-makingindividual empowermentprocess controltiered and classi-fied governance

卢育兰

展开 >

中共福州市委党校法学教研部,福建 福州 350014

算法决策 个体赋权 程序控制 分类分级治理

2025

合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)
合肥工业大学

合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)

影响因子:0.431
ISSN:1008-3634
年,卷(期):2025.39(1)