化工设计2024,Vol.34Issue(5) :21-24,29.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6247.2024.05.005

烧碱三效逆流和三效顺流蒸发工艺的分析对比

Analysis and Comparison of Three Effect Countercurrent and Three Effect Concurrent Evaporation Processes for Caustic Soda

徐秀海 赵明恩 黄泽茂 王琼
化工设计2024,Vol.34Issue(5) :21-24,29.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6247.2024.05.005

烧碱三效逆流和三效顺流蒸发工艺的分析对比

Analysis and Comparison of Three Effect Countercurrent and Three Effect Concurrent Evaporation Processes for Caustic Soda

徐秀海 1赵明恩 1黄泽茂 1王琼1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中国成达工程有限公司,四川 成都 610041
  • 折叠

摘要

本文对烧碱三效逆流和三效顺流蒸发工艺的技术特点进行了对比,利用Aspen Plus V10定量分析了两种工艺对加热热源生蒸汽质和量的需求,并分析了传热温差和原料碱温度两个参数对蒸汽质和量需求的影响,为工程设计中蒸发流程的选择提供参考.

Abstract

This paper compares the technical characteristics of the three effect counter current and three effect concurrent evaporation processes for caustic soda.Aspen Plus V10 is used to quantitatively analyze the requirements for the quality and quantity of steam generated by heating source in two processes.The impact of two parameters,heat transfer temperature difference and raw material alkali temperature,on the requirements for steam quality and quantity is analyzed,providing reference for the selection of evaporation process flow in engineering design.

关键词

烧碱蒸发/三效逆流/三效顺流/工艺比选/流程模拟

Key words

caustic soda evaporation/three-effect countercurrent/three-effect concurrent flow/process comparison and selection/process simulation

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
化工设计
中国成达工程有限公司 中国石油和化工勘察设计协会

化工设计

影响因子:0.262
ISSN:1007-6247
段落导航相关论文