Objective To investigate the difference of quantitative measurement value and quality of life in patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated by laparoscopic iliopectineal ligament suspension and sacral ligament suspension.Methods A total of 41 patients hospitalized in the Gynecology Department of Longyan Second Hospital from Septem-ber 2021 to January 2023 were conveniently selected as the study objects and were divided into observation group(il-iopectineal ligament suspension group)with 21 cases and control group(sacral ligament suspension group)with 20 cases according to random number table method.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and quantitative mea-surement of pelvic organ prolapse 6 months after operation were compared between the two groups.Results The opera-tion time[(72.34±9.20)min]and hospitalization time[(5.46±0.52)d]in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group(85.50±13.16)min and(6.63±0.70)d,and the differences were statistically significant(t=3.726,6.096,both P<0.05).At 6 months after operation,the quantitative measurement of pelvic organ prolapse,Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form 7 and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20 scores in observation group were lower than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The score of Pel-vic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Function Questionnaire-12 in observation group was higher than that of con-trol group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Comparing with sacral ligament sus-pension,iliopectineal ligament suspension is significantly better for patients with pelvic organ prolapse in terms of shortening operation time,length of hospital stay and improving quality of life.
关键词
盆腔器官脱垂/髂耻韧带悬吊术/骶韧带悬吊术
Key words
Pelvic organ prolapse/Iliopectineal ligament suspension/Sacral ligament suspension
维普
万方数据