To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Lower Cath-eter Suction Liquefaction Drainage and Hematoma Removal of Small Bone Window Craniotomy in the Treatment of Cerebral Hemorrhage
Objective To investigate the application of minimally invasive tube aspiration and liquefaction drainage and small bone window craniotomy hematoma removal in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage.Methods A total of 80 patients with cerebral hemorrhage admitted to Jiyang District People's Hospital from July 2021 to July 2023 were ran-domly selected as the study objects and divided into control group and observation group according to the different treatment methods,with 40 cases in each group.The control group was treated with small bone window craniotomy he-matoma removal,and the observation group was treated with minimally invasive lower suction and liquefaction drain-age.Hematoma clearance,nerve function,prognosis and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The hematoma clearance rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the score of Na-tional Institute of Health Stroke Scale was(10.26±1.27)points,which was lower than(11.87±1.34)points of the control group,and the score of Glasgow Outcome Scale was higher than that of the control group,the differences were statisti-cally significant(t=7.385,5.515,7.552,all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive lower suction and liquefaction drainage is more effective in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage,which can improve the clearance rate of hematoma and alleviate neurological dys-function,and has good safety.
维普
万方数据
