目的 对头颈部肿瘤患者接受放疗时采取优质护理的效果分析.方法 方便选取2021年1月—2023年9月盐城市第一人民医院收治的119例头颈部肿瘤放疗治疗患者为研究对象,根据不同护理措施分为两组,对照组59例,行常规护理;研究组60例,行优质护理.比较两组患者的护理满意度、营养指标、生活质量与负性情绪.结果 研究组患者的护理满意度为98.33%(59/60),高于对照组的84.75%(50/59),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.479,P=0.019).护理前,两组患者的营养风险筛查2002量表评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,两组患者的营养风险筛查2002年量表得分均低于护理前,研究组得分低对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05).护理前,两组患者的生活质量自评量表(MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey,SF-36)结果比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);护理后,两组患者的SF-36评分各维度分值均高于护理前,且研究组各维度得分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05).护理前,两组患者焦虑自评量表(Self-rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)与抑郁自评量表(Self-rating Depression Scale,SDS)评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);护理后,两组患者的负性情绪评分低于护理前,且研究组SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05).结论 头颈部肿瘤患者接受放疗时通过优质护理可以获得理想效果.
Analysis of Nursing Effect of High-quality Nursing in Patients with Head and Neck Tumors During Radiotherapy
Objective To analyze the effect of high-quality nursing for patients with head and neck tumors during ra-diotherapy.Methods A total of 119 patients with head and neck tumors who received radiotherapy in Yancheng First People's Hospital from January 2021 to September 2023 were randomly selected and divided into two groups accord-ing to different nursing measures.There were 59 cases in the control group who received routine nursing,and 60 cases in the study group who received high-quality nursing.The nursing satisfaction,nutritional indicators,quality of life and negative emotions of the two groups were compared.Results The nursing satisfaction of patients in the study group was 98.33%(59/60),which was higher than 84.75%(50/59)in the control group,and the difference was statisti-cally significant(χ2=5.479,P=0.019).Before nursing,there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing,the scores of Nutritional Risk Screen-ing 2002 of patients in both groups were lower than that before nursing,but the scores in the study group was higher than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Before nursing,there was no statistically significant difference in the results of the MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36)between the two groups(all P>0.05);after nursing,the scores of all dimensions of SF-36 in both groups were higher than those be-fore radiotherapy,and the scores of all dimensions in the study group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Before nursing,the scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)of patients in the two groups were compared,and the differences were not sta-tistically significant(both P>0.05);after nursing,the negative emotion scores of patients in both groups were lower than those before nursing,and the SAS and SDS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with head and neck tumors can achieve ideal results through high-quality nursing during radiotherapy.
Head and neck tumorsNutritional levelQuality of lifeNegative emotionsHigh-quality nursing
万方数据
维普
