环境化学2024,Vol.43Issue(12) :4112-4120.DOI:10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2024100702

再生水补给型城市河道水生态环境质量评价方法研究

Study on water ecological evaluation method of urban river water with regenerated water recharge

李黛青 夏莎莎 张镇松 李洁 李红华
环境化学2024,Vol.43Issue(12) :4112-4120.DOI:10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2024100702

再生水补给型城市河道水生态环境质量评价方法研究

Study on water ecological evaluation method of urban river water with regenerated water recharge

李黛青 1夏莎莎 1张镇松 1李洁 1李红华1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心,北京,100085
  • 折叠

摘要

城市河道的水生态环境质量对城市的可持续发展和居民生活质量至关重要.随着《水污染防治行动计划》的颁布和实施,我国城市河道水质有了显著的提高.北方缺水城市普遍采用再生水补给河道,更易受人类活动影响.目前城市河道水生态评价技术体系逐渐从单一水质评价转变到水生态环境质量综合评价,但仍需进一步完善,特别是对再生水补给型河道,建立和选择多要素、更适用的综合评价体系和方法尤为重要.本研究对北方缺水城市中再生水补给型城市河道的水生态环境,以两条不同护岸类型的河流为研究对象,进行了包含水质、生境和水生生物的水生态环境质量综合评价,并讨论了不同水生生物评价指数参与评价的综合评价差异.研究发现,尽管两条河流在丰水期和平水期的水质状况相似,硬质护岸河段的水质略优,但软质护岸河段在生境条件和底栖动物评价指数上表现更佳;尤其在平水期,软质护岸河段的生物多样性更为丰富;综合评价结果显示,软质护岸河段的水生态环境质量整体优于硬质护岸河段.而在水生生物评价指数的选择上,生物指数(BI)、生物学污染指数(BP1)、香农-维纳多样性指数(H)均能较合理地反映出研究区域城市河道的水生态综合质量.研究建议,在河道整治和设计中,应更多采用软质护岸,以提升生境和生物多样性,实现美丽河湖与城市自然环境的融合.

Abstract

The health of urban river is very important to the sustainable development of the city and the quality of life of the residents.With the promulgation and implementation of the Action Plan for Water Pollution Prevention and Control,the water quality of urban river in China has been significantly improved.Urban rivers in arid cities in the north are generally replenished with regenerated water,which are more susceptible to human activities.Currently,the water ecological evaluation technology system is gradually shifting from a single water quality evaluation to a comprehensive evaluation of water ecological quality,but it still needs to be further improved,especially for rivers replenished with regenerated water.It is particularly important to establish and select multi-factor,more suitable comprehensive evaluation systems and methods for such rivers.This study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of water ecological quality,including water quality,habitats,and aquatic organisms,for two rivers with different types of riverbanks in a water-scarce city in the north,and discussed the differences in the comprehensive evaluation results with different aquatic organism evaluation indices.The study found that although the water quality of the two rivers was similar during the high-water period and the normal-water period,the water quality of the hard armor protection river was slightly better,but the softbank protection river performed better in terms of habitat conditions and the evaluationindices of zoobenthos;in particular,the biological diversity was more abundant in the softbank protection river during the normal-water period.The comprehensive evaluation results showed that the water ecological quality of the softbank protection river was overall better than that of the hard armor protection river.In terms of the selection of aquatic organism evaluation indices,the biotic index(BI),the biological pollution index(BPI),and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index(H)could all reasonably reflect the comprehensive water ecological quality of the study area's urban rivers.The study suggests that more softbank protection rivers should be adopted in river embankment and design to improve habitats and biodiversity and achieve the integration of beautiful rivers and natural environments in cities.

关键词

城市河道/底栖动物评价指数/水生态质量综合指数

Key words

surban river/evaluation indices of zoobenthos/comprehensive evaluation of water ecological quality

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
环境化学
中国科学院生态环境研究中心

环境化学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.049
ISSN:0254-6108
段落导航相关论文