首页|单通道与三通道扩压器冷态流阻特性对比研究

单通道与三通道扩压器冷态流阻特性对比研究

扫码查看
为了给高温升燃烧室扩压器选型提供技术支撑,以某高温升燃烧室全环试验件为平台,获得进口总压500kPa以及进口温度500K条件下的单通道三通道扩压器与三通道扩压器燃烧室的总压损失特性随燃烧室进口马赫数的变化规律,同时借助CFD技术开展数值仿真,试验与数值仿真结果对比表明:相同状态下,单通道扩压器燃烧室方案扩压器、火焰筒以及燃烧室总压损失均低于三通道扩压器方案,设计点条件下扩压器、火焰筒以及燃烧室总压损失分别降低了 0.13%、0.02%以及0.16%;所选的数值仿真方法可用于评估燃烧室冷态流阻特性变化趋势,但无法准确评估总压损失绝对值.
Contrastive study on cool flow resistance characteristics between single-channel and three-channel diffuser
In order to provide technical support for the selection of diffuser of high-temperature rise combustor,with a high-temperature rise full annular test piece taken as the test platform,the total pressure loss characteristics varying with the combustor import Mach number of the single-channel and three-channel diffuser combustors under inlet total pressure 500 kPa and inlet temperature 500 K,and numerical simulation was conducted by means of CFD technology as well.The comparison between the experimental and numerical simulation results showed that:the total pressure loss of diffuser,flame tube,and combustor in the single-channel diffuser combustor was lower than that in the three-channel diffuser combustor,the total pressure loss of diffuser,flame tube and combustor was reduced by 0.13%,0.02%and 0.16%,separately at the design point;the selected numerical simulation method could be used to evaluate the variation trend of cold flow resistance characteristics of combustor,but it could not accurately evaluate the absolute value of total pressure loss.

single-channelthree-channeldiffusercool flow resistancetotal pressure loss

邹运、徐宝龙、万斌、程明

展开 >

中国航发沈阳发动机研究所,沈阳 110015

单通道 三通道 扩压器 冷态流阻 总压损失

国家自然科学基金

9144112

2024

航空动力学报
中国航空学会

航空动力学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.59
ISSN:1000-8055
年,卷(期):2024.39(2)
  • 19