首页|一型逆时针主旋翼的双发直升机进气流场数值仿真分析

一型逆时针主旋翼的双发直升机进气流场数值仿真分析

扫码查看
通过数值仿真方法模拟了一型逆时针主旋翼的双发直升机在稳定前飞、侧飞、悬停状态下的流场,获取了不同飞行状态下的进气总压损失和进气温升。结果显示:稳定前飞时发动机进气面平均总压损失随飞行速度增大而增大,最大约为1。61%;侧飞时下游发动机进气道外侧区域存在较大的进气总压损失,且下游发动机进气存在较大温升;同速度下右侧飞时下游发动机进气温升幅度更高,对发动机工作性能影响更大;悬停状态下发动机进气面平均总压损失最大约为1。14%。通过与该型直升机飞行数据对比,验证了数值仿真结果的有效性。研究结果可以为国内同类型直升机试飞科目规划和发动机安装损失评估提供参考。
Numerical simulation analysis of inlet flow field of anti-clockwise main rotor helicopter with two engines
The flow field of an anti-clockwise main rotor helicopter with two engines in steady forward flight,side flight and hovering was simulated by numerical simulation method,and the total inlet pressure loss and inlet temperature rise under different flight states were obtained.The results showed that the average total pressure loss of the engine intake surface increased with the increase of steady forward flight speed,and the maximum was about 1.61%.During side flight,there was a large total pressure loss in the outer area of the downstream engine inlet and a large air temperature rise in the downstream engine inlet.At the same speed,the inlet temperature rise of the downstream engine was higher when flying on the right wind,which had greater influence on the engine performance.The maximum average total pressure loss of the engine inlet surface was about 1.14%under the hovering state.Compared with the flight data of this helicopter,the effectiveness of the numerical simulation results was verified.The result can provide a reference for domestic flight test subject planning and engine installation loss evaluation of the same type of helicopter.

helicoptersteady forward flightsideward flighthoveringinlet total pressure loss

杨柳、刘雨

展开 >

中国航空工业集团有限公司中国飞行试验研究院,西安 710089

直升机 稳定前飞 侧飞 悬停 进气总压损失

2024

航空动力学报
中国航空学会

航空动力学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.59
ISSN:1000-8055
年,卷(期):2024.39(6)
  • 5