中国航空学报(英文版)2024,Vol.37Issue(5) :392-409.DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2023.12.004

Space debris environment engineering model 2019:Algorithms improvement and comparison with ORDEM 3.1 and MASTER-8

Yuyan LIU Runqiang CHI Baojun PANG Diqi HU Wuxiong CAO Dongfang WANG
中国航空学报(英文版)2024,Vol.37Issue(5) :392-409.DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2023.12.004

Space debris environment engineering model 2019:Algorithms improvement and comparison with ORDEM 3.1 and MASTER-8

Yuyan LIU 1Runqiang CHI 1Baojun PANG 1Diqi HU 1Wuxiong CAO 1Dongfang WANG2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. School of Astronautics,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150001,China
  • 2. School of Astronautics,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150001,China;College of Safety Science & Engineering,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China
  • 折叠

Abstract

As an essential tool for realistic description of the current or future debris environment,the Space Debris Environment Engineering Model(SDEEM)has been developed to provide sup-port for risk assessment of spacecraft.In contrast with SDEEM2015,SDEEM2019,the latest ver-sion,extends the orbital range from the Low Earth Orbit(LEO)to Geosynchronous Orbit(GEO)for the years 1958-2050.In this paper,improved modeling algorithms used by SDEEM2019 in propagating simulation,spatial density distribution,and spacecraft flux evaluation are presented.The debris fluxes of SDEEM2019 are compared with those of three typical models,i.e.,SDEEM2015,Orbital Debris Engineering Model 3.1(ORDEM 3.1),and Meteoroid and Space Debris Terrestrial Environment Reference(MASTER-8),in terms of two assessment modes.Three orbital cases,including the Geostationary Transfer Orbit(GTO),Sun-Synchronous Orbit(SSO)and International Space Station(ISS)orbit,are selected for the spacecraft assessment mode,and the LEO region is selected for the spatial density assessment mode.The analysis indicates that com-pared with previous algorithms,the variable step-size orbital propagating algorithm based on semi-major axis control is more precise,the spatial density algorithm based on the second zonal har-monic of the non-spherical Earth gravity(J2)is more applicable,and the result of the position-centered spacecraft flux algorithm is more convergent.The comparison shows that SDEEM2019 and MASTER-8 have consistent trends due to similar modeling processes,while the differences between SDEEM2019 and ORDEM 3.1 are mainly caused by different modeling approaches for uncatalogued debris.

Key words

SDEEM2019/Space debris propagating algorithm/Spatial density algorithm/ORDEM 3.1/MASTER-8

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国航空学报(英文版)
中国航空学会

中国航空学报(英文版)

CSTPCDCSCDEI
影响因子:0.847
ISSN:1000-9361
参考文献量47
段落导航相关论文