首页|两种地电场仪数据形态的对比分析

两种地电场仪数据形态的对比分析

扫码查看
选取应城地震监测站ZD9A-2B和GEF-2地电场仪的数据进行对比分析,发现二者记录的地电场正常日变化和各种干扰的形态基本一致.GEF-2地电场仪量程更广,包含的高频信息更丰富,抵抗雷电干扰的能力更强,运行更稳定.由两种仪器观测数据计算得到的地电场优势方位角差别不大.研究结果表明,使用高采样率的仪器或有助于发现更多地震孕育过程中产生的脉冲电信号.
Comparative Analysis Between Data from Two Geoelectric Observation Apparatus
By comparing and analyzing the data from the ZD9A-2B and GEF-2 geo-electrical observation apparatus at Yingcheng earthquake monitoring station,it was found that the normal daily change and forms of various disturbances in the geoelectric field recorded by them were consistent.GEF-2 has a wider measurement span and contains richer high-frequency information.Meanwhile,it can capture more pulse current signals and has stronger resistance to lightning interference.The difference in the geoelectric field preferred orientation calculated from the observation data of the two instruments is not significant.The study result show that it may be helpful to find more pulse signals of geoelectric field with geoelectric observation apparatus which has higher sampling rate.

geoelectric observation apparatuspulse electric signalZD9A-2BGEF-2

陈星星、张建涛、王明贵、周超

展开 >

中国地震局地震研究所,湖北 武汉

地震预警湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉

湖北省地震局,湖北武汉

地电场仪 脉冲电信号 ZD9A-2B GEF-2

中国地震局监测、预报、科研三结合课题

3JH-202301056

2024

科学技术创新
黑龙江省科普事业中心

科学技术创新

影响因子:0.842
ISSN:1673-1328
年,卷(期):2024.(5)
  • 8