首页|感知年龄歧视量表的汉化及在社区老年入中的信效度检验

感知年龄歧视量表的汉化及在社区老年入中的信效度检验

扫码查看
目的 翻译英文版感知年龄歧视量表,并在社区老年人中检验信效度.方法 获得量表作者授权,采用Brislin翻译模型,对英文版量表进行翻译、回译、整合、文化调适及预调查,形成中文版量表.应用中文版感知年龄歧视量表对540名年龄≥60岁的社区老年人进行调查,检验量表的信效度.结果 探索性因子分析提取2个特征根>1的公因子,共7个条目,累计方差贡献率为60.249%.验证性因子分析显示,模型拟合指标较好(x2/df=1.172,RMSEA=0.024,RMR=0.018,AGFI=0.970,CFI=0.998,IFI=0.998,TLI=0.995).量表条目水平的内容效度指数0.833~1.000,全体一致内容效度指数0.857.量表的Cron-bach's α系数0.808,重测信度0.821.结论 中文版感知年龄歧视量表具有较好的信效度,可作为老年人感知年龄歧视程度的测评工具.
Translating and validating the Perceived Ageism Questionnaire in Chinese communi-ty-dwelling older people
Objective To translate the Perceived Ageism Questionnaire(PAQ)into simplified Chinese,and to assess its reliability and validity in community-dwelling older people.Methods After obtaining authorization from the original author,cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was carried out,following the Brislin's translation model,for which the following steps were in-cluded:translation,retro translation,integration,submission to expert judges,and pilot test.Then 540 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years were surveyed to test the reliability and validity.Results Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors(with ei-genvalue>1)that explained 60.249%of the total variance.Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent goodness of fit indices for the two-factor structure(x2/df=1.172,RMSEA=0.024,RMR=0.018,AGF1=0.970,CFI=0.998,IFI=0.998,TLI=0.995).The item-level content validity index(CVI)ranged from 0.833 to 1.000,and the S-CVI/universal agreement(S-CVI/UA)was 0.857.The Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.808 and the test-retest reliability was 0.821.Conclusion The Chinese version of the PAQ is valid and reliable to assess subjective ageism among older adults.

older adultperceived ageismagingreliabilityvalidityquestionnaire survey

吕旭晶、高欢玲、李红梅、郑晓云、马彩虹、张思苑、崔彩彩

展开 >

山西医科大学汾阳学院(山西吕梁,032200)

山西省汾阳医院

老年人 年龄歧视 老龄化 信度 效度 问卷调查

吕梁市科技计划项目山西医科大学汾阳学院科研课题

吕科发[2020]33号-152020B08

2024

护理学杂志
华中科技大学同济医学院

护理学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.062
ISSN:1001-4152
年,卷(期):2024.39(17)