首页|基于频域和时域法的电池包随机振动疲劳计算对比研究

基于频域和时域法的电池包随机振动疲劳计算对比研究

扫码查看
针对频域法和时域法在随机振动疲劳计算中的适用性问题,以某型号电池包为研究对象,综合研究了2种方法的计算精度和计算效率.首先,建立电池包有限元模型,并通过模态试验进行验证;其次,以国标GB 38031―2020加速度功率谱密度(PSD)载荷谱作为频域载荷输入,并利用傅里叶逆变换技术将其转换为加速度时域载荷;最后,分别基于频域法和时域法计算电池包的振动加速度、应力和疲劳寿命,并进行了计算精度、效率的对比分析和精度的试验验证.结果表明,在电池包总振级和应力均方根值(RMS)方面,频域法和时域法计算结果相近,相对误差小于16%;在加速度和应力峰值方面,频域法"3σ"计算结果与时域法差距较大,若采用"4σ"或"5σ"原则,计算结果与时域法相近,相对误差小于15%;在振动疲劳方面,频域法计算寿命约为时域法的3~6倍,主要原因包括Dirlik模型和应力响应PSD谱差异,其中Dirlik模型造成的差距小于1.5倍;在计算效率方面,频域法比时域法高约134倍.试验数据表明,时域法计算精度更高,适用于结构危险位置振动疲劳的精确计算,而频域法计算效率更高,适用于结构危险位置的快速预测.
A Comparing Study on Battery Pack Random Vibration Fatigue Calculation Based on Frequency Domain and Time Domain Approaches
Focusing on the applicability of the frequency domain method and time domain method in random vibration fatigue calculation,the accuracy and efficiency of the two methods are comprehensively studied with a certain type of battery pack as the research object.First,a finite element model of the battery pack is established and verified through the modal test.Secondly,the acceleration Power Spectral Density(PSD)of GB 38031―2020 is taken as the load spectrum in the frequency domain and converted into the time domain load using Fourier inverse transformation technology.Finally,the vibration acceleration,stress,and fatigue life of the battery pack are calculated based on the frequency domain method and the time domain method,respectively.The calculation accuracy and efficiency of both methods are compared and verified by the test.The results show that in regard of the total vibration level and stress RMS value of the battery pack,the calculated values of the frequency domain method and the time domain method are similar,and the relative error is less than 16%.For the peak value of acceleration and stress,the"3σ"calculation results of frequency domain method are much different from those of time domain method.With the adoption of the"4σ"or"5σ"principle,the calculation results of both methods are similar,and the relative error is less than 15%.In concern of vibration fatigue,the calculated life by the frequency domain method is about as 3 to 6 times long as that by the time domain method.The main reasons include Dirlik model and stress response PSD,in which the difference caused by the Dirlik model is less than 1.5 times.In terms of computational efficiency,the frequency domain method is about 134 times faster than the time domain method.The test data show that the time domain method is with higher accuracy and suitable for the accurate calculation of vibration fatigue at dangerous positions,while the frequency domain method is more efficient and suitable for the rapid prediction of structural high-risk positions.

battery packrandom vibrationfatigue lifetime domain analysisfrequency domain analysis

吴光强、李超、丁丰、章蕾

展开 >

同济大学 汽车学院,上海 201804

卡特彼勒技术研发(中国)有限公司,江苏 无锡 214000

电池包 随机振动 疲劳寿命 时域分析 频域分析

国家重点研发计划资助项目

2021YFB2500803

2024

湖南大学学报(自然科学版)
湖南大学

湖南大学学报(自然科学版)

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.651
ISSN:1674-2974
年,卷(期):2024.51(2)
  • 20