网络犯罪帮助行为的正犯规制及共犯责任
Regulation of Principal Offenders and Accomplices in Cybercrime Assistance Behavior
陈超1
作者信息
摘要
帮助行为正犯化是积极主义刑法观在刑事立法中的典型表现.帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪成为独立罪名后,网络犯罪帮助行为存在具体犯罪共犯与本罪正犯责任类型,以致实践中对网络犯罪帮助行为的司法认定存在立场不清、界定标准不一、界限不明确等问题.为避免针对帮助行为刑罚适用的不当扩张,应立足于二元犯罪论参与体系,以帮助行为正犯化独立的法益侵害性为基础,通过在主观方面厘清正犯的明知与共犯的犯意联络,在客观方面对正犯化的帮助行为类型进行相当性解释,严格把握本罪中"情节严重"的罪量要素来区分网络犯罪帮助行为的正犯责任和共犯责任,进而实现对网络犯罪帮助行为的准确认定.
Abstract
"Treating an aider as a perpetrator"is a typical manifestation of the positive concept in criminal legislation.After the addition of Article 287Ⅱ,there are two types of responsibility for assisting in network crime:accomplice and principal,resulting in unclear positions,inconsistent standards for definition,and unclear boundaries in judicial practice.To avoid improper expansion of the application of criminal penalties for assistance behavior,the system of differentiating between the principal and the accomplice should be based on the independent infringement of legal interests of assistance behavior.It is necessary to provide equivalent explanations for the types of assistance behavior that are criminalized in terms of objective identification by distinguishing the connection between the knowledge of the principal offender and the intention of the accomplice in subjective determination,and strictly grasp the criminal element of"serious circumstances"to distinguish between the responsibility of the principal offender and the accomplice's responsibility,so as to achieve reasonable regulation of cybercrime assistance behavior.
关键词
帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪/帮助行为/正犯规制/共犯责任/帮助行为正犯化Key words
crime of helping information network crime/assistance behavior/principal offender/accomplice/treating aider as perpetrator引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学基金重大项目(2021)(21&ZD209)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据