主体区分立场下诈骗行为的限缩认定
The Limiting Determination of Fraud Under the Position of Subject Differentiation
姜文智 1周清清1
作者信息
摘要
诈骗行为的判断不是固化的,需要根据行为主体作出不同认定.由于民事主体、商事主体和行政机关存在天然的能力差距,进行区分认定不违背平等原则.商事主体的营利性、商业性决定其以完成交易为主要目的,商业行为中存在的一般夸张不是诈骗行为,而是具有社会相当性的日常举止.相较而言,民事主体的缔约能力较弱,应限缩不作为诈骗的成立,对于利用系统漏洞、薅羊毛的行为应予以出罪.行政机关作出行政给付行为时,其目的是实现公共福利,当申请人或行政相对人部分文件的造假行为无碍目的实现时,不属于诈骗行为.
Abstract
The judgment of fraud is not solidified and needs to be determined differently according to the subject of the act.Due to the natural ability gap among civil subjects,commercial subjects,and administrative authorities,making differentiated determinations does not violate the principle of equality.The profitability and commercial nature of a business entity determine that its primary purpose is to complete transactions.The general exaggeration of commercial behavior is not fraud,but the daily behavior of social equivalence.Compared to the civil subject's contracting weak ability,we should limit the establishment of fraud by omission.For the use of system loopholes,deal hunting behavior should be decriminalized.Administrative organs make administrative payment behavior when its purpose is public welfare.Part of the document forgery which does not hinder the realization of the purpose does not belong to fraud.
关键词
诈骗行为/平等原则/整体财产说/目的失败理论Key words
fraud/principle of equality/whole property theory/purpose failure theory引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据