首页|O型臂导航在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症中的应用

O型臂导航在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症中的应用

扫码查看
目的 比较O型臂导航辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar in-terbody fusion,MIS-TLIF)与C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效.方法 对2022-06/2023-06月42例在作者医院行O型臂辅助或C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF治疗单节段退行性腰椎滑脱症患者的资料进行分析.依据手术类型将患者分为O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组(n=20)和C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组(n=22),O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组患者接受O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF治疗,C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组患者接受C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF治疗.比较两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者人口统计学变量、围手术期指标、背部与腿部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogu scale,VAS)评分、Oswe-stry 残疾指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)及临床结局.结果 O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组患者术中出血量、术后引流量显著低于C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者的置钉准确率明显高于C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者背痛VAS评分、ODI评分随时间不断降低(P均<0.05).同一时间点比较,术前两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者背痛VAS评分、ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1周与术后3个月,O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者背痛VAS评分、ODI评分低于C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组(P均<0.05),其余时间点两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者背痛VAS评分、ODI评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者腿痛VAS评分随时间不断降低(P均<0.05).两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者各时间点腿痛VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).O型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组、C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF组退行性腰椎滑脱症Odom标准总体优良率分别为85.00%、90.91%,二者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组退行性腰椎滑脱症患者在术后12个月复查时均无融合失败病例,均无相关并发症发生.结论 O型臂导航辅助MIS-TLIF治疗单节段Ⅰ~Ⅱ级退行性腰椎滑脱症安全有效,相较于C型臂辅助MIS-TLIF具有置钉的精确度高、手术创伤小、术后疼痛较轻等优势.
Application of O-arm Navigation in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of O-arm navigation assisted minimally invasive transfo-raminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)and C-arm assisted MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spon-dylolisthesis.Methods Data of 42 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent O-arm-assisted or C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF in author's hospital were analyzed from June 2022 to June 2023.The patients were divided into O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group(n=20)and C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group(n=22)according to the type of surgery.Patients in the O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group were treated with O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF,and the patients in the C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group were treated with C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF.Demographic variables,perioperative indicators,visual analogu scale(VAS)score of back and leg pain,Oswestry disability index(ODI)and clini-cal outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis between two groups were evaluated and compared.Results The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in the C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The accuracy of screw placement of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group was significantly higher than that in the C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group and the differ-ences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS score of back pain and ODI score of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in two groups decreased by time(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score of back pain and ODI score of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis between the two groups before surgery at the same timing(P>0.05),at 1 week and 3 months after surgery,VAS score of back pain and ODI score of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group were lower than those in the C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group(all P<0.05),there was no sig-nificant difference in VAS score of back pain and ODI score of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis between the two groups at other timing(P>0.05).The VAS scores of leg pain of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolis-thesis in the two groups decreased by time(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score of leg pain of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis between the two groups at each timing(P>0.05).The overall excel-lent and good rates of Odom criteria in O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group and C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF group were 85.00%and 90.91%respectively,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no fusion failure and related complications of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the two groups at 12 months after surgery.Conclusion The O-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF is safe and effective in the treatment of single-segmentⅠ-Ⅱ degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis,compared with the C-arm-assisted MIS-TLIF,it has the advantages of high accuracy of screw placement,small surgical trauma and less postoperative pain.

O-arm navigationMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionDegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisDegenerative disease of spine

陈胤、杨磊、徐峰

展开 >

430065 湖北武汉,武汉科技大学医学部医学院

中部战区总医院骨科

O型臂导航 微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术 退行性腰椎滑脱症 脊柱退行性疾病

武汉市应用基础前沿项目

2019020701011423

2024

华南国防医学杂志
广州军区医学科学技术委员会

华南国防医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.748
ISSN:1009-2595
年,卷(期):2024.38(4)
  • 20