首页|非法狩猎罪之司法认定的困惑、标准及限缩

非法狩猎罪之司法认定的困惑、标准及限缩

扫码查看
近年来,非法狩猎罪案件有悖常理的判决时有出现,显现出社会认知与司法认定的冲突.重新审视司法认定标准、解决司法认定之争议,是缓解此种冲突的现实之需.通过裁判文书网收集 2022-2024 年相关的非法狩猎一审刑事判决书 311 份,分析发现具有认定情形单一、行为人法治意识淡薄以及刑事处罚以非监禁刑为主的三大特点.基于非法狩猎罪的基本特征,在司法认定中存在以下困惑,即认定标准不一致、违法性认识以及刑事惩罚泛化性的问题.从理论上和立法中明确现行司法认定标准所存在的客观上"情节严重"、主观上"明知"以及保护法益不明晰所致使"行刑"不分的争议,是解决其困惑的根本.为了增强法律的权威性以及司法的公信力,应对非法狩猎罪之司法认定行为进行限缩,先需明确"情节严重"认定的严谨性和"明知"认定的必要性,再应遵循刑法谦抑性原则,以保护法益为基准,对野生动物进行层级性保护.审慎认定非法狩猎罪,在形式上可能不利于对野生动物及其资源的保护,但从长远来看,其兼具保护野生动物和人类双重利益.
Confusion,Standards and Limitations of Judicial Determination of Illegal Hunting Offenses
In recent years,there have been numerous cases of illegal hunting crime cases that have been ruled against common sense,showing the conflict between social cognition and judicial determination.Reexamining the standard of judicial determination and resolving the controversy of judicial determination is a practical need to alleviate such conflict.We collected 311 first-instance criminal judgments on illegal hunting from 2022 to 2024 and analyzed them and found that there are three major features:single determination,shallow awareness of the rule of law of the perpetrators,and non-custodial sentences as the main criminal punishment.Based on the basic features of the crime of illegal hunting,there are following confusions in the judicial determination,namely,the inconsistency of the determination standard,the recognition of illegality,and the problem of generalization of criminal punishment.Theoretically and legislatively,it is fundamental to resolve the confusion by clarifying the disputes over the objective"seriousness of the circumstances",the subjective"knowledge",and the lack of clarity in the protection of legal interests that exist in the current judicial determination standards,which results in a lack of distinction between punishment and enforcement.To enhance the credibility of justice and the authority of the law,the judicial determination of illegal hunting crime should be limited,first need to clarify the"aggravating circumstances"identified rigorous and"knowingly"identify the need to follow the principle of modesty in criminal law,to protect the interests of the law.The principle of moderation of the criminal law should be followed,and the protection of the law should be taken as the benchmark for the protection of the interests of wild animals.The prudent determination of the crime of illegal hunting may not be conducive to the protection of wildlife and its resources in form,but in the long run,it has the dual interests of protecting wildlife and human beings.

wildlifeillegal hunting offensesjudicial determinationssubstantive examination

向佐群、龙小凤

展开 >

中南林业科技大学法学院,湖南 长沙 410004

中南林业科技大学湖南检察案例研究基地,湖南 长沙 410004

中南林业科技大学湖南省生态安全检察理论研究中心,湖南 长沙 410004

野生动物 非法狩猎罪 司法认定 实质审查

2024

中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版)
中南林业科技大学

中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.629
ISSN:1673-9272
年,卷(期):2024.18(4)