首页|黄南州"4·23"暴雪天气过程数值预报产品检验

黄南州"4·23"暴雪天气过程数值预报产品检验

扫码查看
[目的]对2022年4月23日出现的暴雪天气进行数值模式检验分析,检验各种数值预报产品对强降雪的预报能力,从而提高本地暴雪预报准确率.[方法]选取此次暴雪天气过程(四个国家站及区域自动站 24 h累计降雪量≥10 mm),采用天气学分析、对比分析法,利用EC-thin,CMA-3KM和CMA-GFS三种模式与暴雪个例实况进行检验对比评估.[结果]①环流形势场对比CMA-GFS模式对于高原槽预报较EC稳定且准确,基本与实况吻合,而EC越靠近临近时次预报更为准确;从槽线移速来看,两家模式均预报槽线移速比实况快.②24小时降水预报检验,EC模式对落区、强度的把握明显优于CMA-GFS模式,且临近时次预报效果最佳.③一般性降水准确率预报CMA-3KM参考性最好,且最稳定,准确均在70%以上;三种模式的暴雪的准确率并不稳定,夜间出现的暴雪预报效果08时次优于20时次.[结论]CMA-3KM预报降水效果较好,但稳定性不高,EC模式对降水的落区、强度的把握优于CMA_GFS模式,且临近时次预报效果最佳.
Testing of Numerical Forecast Products for"4·23"Blizzard Weather Process in Huangnan Region
[Purposes]In this paper,through the numerical model test analysis of the blizzard weather on April 23,2022,the forecast ability of various numerical forecast products for blizzard is tested by com-parison,so as to achieve the purpose of improving the accuracy of local blizzard forecast.[Methods]This blizzard weather process(cumulative snowfall≥10 mm in 24h at four national stations and regional auto-matic stations)was selected.The synoptic analysis and comparative analysis were used,and three mod-els of EC-thin,CMA-3KM and CMA-GFS were used to test and evaluate the blizzard case.[Findings]①Compared with the situation field,CMA-GFS model is more stable and accurate than EC in predicting the plateau trough,which is basically consistent with the reality,and the closer the EC is,the more accu-rate the sub-forecast is.From the point of view of the trough moving speed,both models predict that the trough moving speed is faster than the real one.②The 24-hour precipitation forecast test showed that EC model was significantly better than CMA-GFS model in grasping the fall area and intensity,and the pre-diction effect was the best near the time.③The general precipitation accuracy forecast CMA-3KM,the most stable method,has the best reference,and its accuracy is above 70%;the accuracy of the three mod-els of blizzard is not stable,and the forecast effect of the nighttime blizzard at 08:00 is better than that at 20:00.[Conclusions]CMA-3KM has a better precipitation forecast effect,but the stability is not high.EC model is better than CMA_GFS model in grasping the fall area and intensity of precipitation,and the closer time approaches,the better forecast effect it has.

blizzard weatherinspection resultCMA-3KMECMWFCMA-GFS

彭英超、宋仙芳、郭安欣

展开 >

黄南藏族自治州气象局,青海 同仁 811399

暴雪天气 检验,CMA-3KM ECMWF模式 CMA-GFS模式

2024

河南科技
河南省科学技术信息研究院

河南科技

影响因子:0.615
ISSN:1003-5168
年,卷(期):2024.51(1)
  • 7