河南科技2024,Vol.51Issue(15) :115-120.DOI:10.19968/j.cnki.hnkj.1003-5168.2024.15.025

生成式人工智能生成内容的权益归属研究

Research on the Ownership of Rights of Generative AI-Generated Con-tent

张文睿 唐逸凡
河南科技2024,Vol.51Issue(15) :115-120.DOI:10.19968/j.cnki.hnkj.1003-5168.2024.15.025

生成式人工智能生成内容的权益归属研究

Research on the Ownership of Rights of Generative AI-Generated Con-tent

张文睿 1唐逸凡2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 河北大学法学院,河北 保定 071002
  • 2. 沧州师范学院政史学院,河北 沧州 061000
  • 折叠

摘要

[目的]明晰生成式人工智能生成内容的权益归属,缓和生成式人工智能与著作权法之间的矛盾,为生成式人工智能著作权法保障提供建议.[方法]通过分析生成式人工智能的运行逻辑,结合著作权权属认定的基本理论与司法实践,探寻生成式人工智能生成内容权益归属的基本原则.[结果]生成式人工智能本身不可作为著作权主体,而在用户与服务提供者之间,当以约定为先,没有约定时则顺位适用法定权属配置规则.[结论]生成式人工智能生成内容权益归属的厘定,有助于纾解生成式人工智能所面临的法律风险,实现著作权法鼓励文化创新的立法目的.

Abstract

[Purposes]This paper aims to clarify the ownership of rights and interests in generative AI-generated content aims to alleviate the sharp contradiction between generative AI and copyright law,and provide copyright law protection for the development of generative AI.[Methods]By analyzing the opera-tion logic of generative AI,and combining with the basic theory and judicial practice of copyright owner-ship determination,this paper explores the basic principles of ownership of content generated by genera-tive AI.[Findings]After clarifying the basic principles,it can be seen that generative AI itself cannot be used as a copyright subject,and between users and service providers,when the agreement takes prece-dence,and if there is no agreement,the legal ownership allocation rules will be applied in order.[Conclu-sions]The determination of the ownership of the rights and interests of generative AI-generated content will help alleviate the legal risks faced by generative AI and achieve the legislative purpose of the Copy-right Law to encourage cultural innovation.

关键词

生成式人工智能/服务提供者/用户/作者中心主义/投资保护主义/权益归属

Key words

generative AI/service providers/user/author-centrism/investment-protectionism/the owner-ship of rights

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
河南科技
河南省科学技术信息研究院

河南科技

影响因子:0.615
ISSN:1003-5168
段落导航相关论文