首页|国家与社会:清末民初议院监督权与政府行政权之调适主张

国家与社会:清末民初议院监督权与政府行政权之调适主张

扫码查看
因对国家权力优先抑或社会权利优先认识上的差异,清末民初时期议院监督与政府行政之间的权力交锋十分激烈.如何合理划分两者之间的权力行使边界,实现合法制衡,既能发挥议院对政府的监督作用又避免政府过度受制于议院而影响行政效率,政学两界人士先后提出了诸多议院监督权与政府行政权调适之思想主张.虽然因受各种条件的制约,这些制度主张没有取得预期效果,但它们无疑是衔接国家政权与社会力量的有益思考,对现代国家治理中"强国家"与"强社会"的良性互动有某些历史启迪.
State and Society:Suggestions on Balancing the Supervision Power of the Parliamentand the Administrative Power of the Government in the Late Qing Dynasty and the Early Republic of China
Due to differences in the understanding of prioritizing national power or social rights,there was intense power struggle between parliamentary supervision and government administration during the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China.Regarding how to reasonably delineate the boundaries of power exercise between the two to achieve legitimate checks and balances,enable parliament to effectively supervise the government while avoiding excessive constraints on the government that may affect administrative efficiency,scholars from both political science and governance fields have put for-ward various ideological propositions regarding adjusting parliamentary supervision powers and governmental administrative powers.Although these institutional proposals did not achieve expected results due to various constraints,they undoubtedly provide valuable reflections on bridging state power with societal forces,offering some historical enlightenment for a benefi-cial interaction between a"strong state"and a"strong society"in modern state governance.

parliamentary supervisiongovernment administrationpower adjustmentthe late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China

肖高华

展开 >

贵州财经大学经济学院(贵州贵阳550025)

议院监督 政府行政 权力调适 清末民初

国家社会科学基金重大项目

18ZDA199

2024

湖南师范大学社会科学学报
湖南师范大学

湖南师范大学社会科学学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.06
ISSN:1000-2529
年,卷(期):2024.53(2)
  • 94