首页|"适合性"是否优先于"理由"?——论规范性的"适合性优先"与"理由优先"之争

"适合性"是否优先于"理由"?——论规范性的"适合性优先"与"理由优先"之争

扫码查看
在元伦理学领域中,围绕什么是具有优先地位的规范性概念,哲学家们形成了许多讨论.其中,"理由优先论"与"适合性优先论"是两种较有潜力的进路.一些人试图通过"恶魔论证"的情境,表明我们更应该接受适合性优先论.然而,在对理由概念进行深入分析后,我们会发现,"恶魔论证"并不能打败理由优先论.适合性优先论虽然在一些方面取得了成功,但该理论可能并不如其支持者所声称的那样,可以完美地替代理由优先论.
Is Fittingness Prior to Reasons?:On the Debate Between"Fittingness-First"and"Reason-First"Theories on Normativity
In the field of metaethics,philosophers have engaged in numerous discussions regarding what constitutes a normative concept with priority.Among them,"reason-first theory"and"fittingness-first theory"are two promising approa-ches.Some individuals attempt to argue for the acceptance of fittingness-first theory through the scenario of the"devil's ad-vocate".However,upon conducting a thorough analysis of the concept of reason,we will find that the devil's advocate argu-ment fails to defeat reason-first theory.Fittingness-first theory has achieved success in certain aspects,but it may not be able to perfectly replace reason-first theory as claimed by its proponents.

reasonfittingnesspriority

陈子衿

展开 >

武汉大学哲学学院(湖北武汉430072)

理由 适合性 优先性

2024

湖南师范大学社会科学学报
湖南师范大学

湖南师范大学社会科学学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.06
ISSN:1000-2529
年,卷(期):2024.53(5)